Everyone wants to compete. This is the derby, the parade, the long, slow march to Oscar. Simultaneously balancing a need for relevance with the inherent necessity to be distinguished can be a high-wire act this time of year, but with the various kudos being dished about, all eyes are turned, more and more, toward the awarding event at hand.
With that in mind, the USC Scripter Awards will not be the foregone conclusion it has been in years past. Generally, the winner would be announced and the big to-do would come later, the winning parties there to accept the award they knew they had coming to them. Now, it seems, the show will have an air of competition about it, and perhaps (as I’m sure the USC Libraries are hoping), an array of nominees turning out as well.
From the hot-off-the-presses release:
For the first time in the 20-year history of the event, the USC Libraries will announce Scripter winners on the evening of the gala.
“Announcing the winner at the ceremony makes for a much more dramatic evening,” said [USC Scripter chair Naomi] Foner Gyllenhaal. “And drama is at the center of any award presentation. This change also gives us a chance to really honor all the finalists among their peers at the event.”
It looks like Jamie Lee Curtis will serve as this year’s emcee, following in the footsteps of Jason Alexander, who I thought did a nice job last year. Additionally, there has been a minor rule change worth noting:
English-language adaptations based on a series of books now qualify for Scripter consideration. Previously, only films based upon individual books, novellas, or short stories were eligible.
Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes!
Well the consistent snubs for Kate Winslet’s performances this week (other than a brief mention by the BFCA for her work in “The Reader”) should go down a little easier for the actress as it seems she’ll be receiving an award at next month’s Santa Barbara Film Festival for her outstanding career so far.
As I suspected, “Rachel Getting Married” and “The Wrestler” were
The Best Picture victory for “Milk” is going to be the lede for most people as far as today’s New York Film Critics Circle awards is concerned, but the bigger story is “Happy-Go-Lucky,” which finds itself right back in the thick of the Oscar conversation.
Alright, so
I have been griping about the state of the movie year since after the Toronto International Film Festival, and frankly I took some heat for bitching about it. So yes, I feel some vindication about the way the season is shaping up: 2008 is a hugely disappointing year at the movies, with only a handful of really brilliant films. After the bounty of last year, obviously our hopes were high, which is a mistake, but it seems we have endured one failure after another this year.
The diligence Los Angeles Times columnist Patrick Goldstein has been doing on this
Shocking. “WALL-E” is officially the most overrated film of the year, but that having been said, this is one hell of a ballsy move on the part of the L.A. film critics (whose vote came down a lot earlier than I expected).
Every year I contribute to the
Alright, the BFCA 
A late night premiere and after party kept me in bed most of the morning. It happens. So I’m just now coming around to today’s BFCA announcement. First, some reactions (full disclosure, I am a member of the organization).