Today we begin our in-depth looks at the individual crafts categories. I’m a sucker for starting with my favorite: Best Cinematography.
The art of film is reliant on the motion picture camera and those men and women who lend their talents behind the lens. The Director of Photography is in charge of charge of capturing the director’s vision on film, not only by ensuring mood through lighting, thematic comment through juxtaposition, etc. This work has to be done in tandem with the director, which makes it not surprising that many cinematographers and directors work together frequently.
This category tends to award “pretty” films. Big epics and gorgeous landscapes frequent the nominated five each year, as do war films and anything generally considered a labored task in this department. That is not to say such efforts have a monopoly on this category –- just that they are especially apt to be nominated.
Last year it was sad to see Roger Deakins lose for the sixth and seventh times on the same evening. I cannot deny that Robert Elswit -– a longtime favorite of mine –- was an excellent choice for “There Will Be Blood,” but the great Deakins is once again searching for his first statuette! He will be back in contention this year, lensing Sam Mendes’ “Revolutionary Road.” This film clearly has Oscar in its sights. While I still remain skeptical on how it will be received overall, Deakins will almost certainly be in contention should the film deliver in the slightest.
Deakins will also be lensing “Doubt” this year, which also has the potential to be a major awards player. Though I’m doubtful (no pun intended) about its chances in this category.
In what would be a historic nomination, Mandy Walker will likely be in contention for Baz Luhrmann’s “Australia.” She would be the first ever woman nominated in this category. Yes, that’s right. No woman has ever been nominated for Best Cinematography in 80 years of Academy history. Lurhmann’s films are always visually spectacular and this effort in particular fits in perfectly with the sorts of epics usually nominated in this category.
I’ve been meaning to cancel my subscription to Interview Magazine for months upon months, probably years at this point. I always forget until I get a new issue, then it gets tossed onto a stack on the shelf and I forget again. But there’s always an interesting one-on-one and the closer we get the the awards season each year, the more pertinent the interviews become.
Everyone has a favourite Oscar category, and Best Original Screenplay is mine. It’s partly because I’m a screenwriter myself, so I feel a little more invested in the outcome. My evaluation of the category often comes down to the question: “Which screenplay do I most wish I’d written first?”
Not a whole lot has piqued my cinematic interest this year. “The Dark Knight,” “Iron Man” and “Vicky Cristina Barcelona” are the happy pre-festival-season exceptions. But even with Toronto not yielding a whole lot in terms of Oscar frontrunners, I am finding more and more to be excited about in the coming months and expect an intense race for that little golden guy. Here are the six (well, seven…you’ll see) most anticipated of the year for me, at this stage…
The Best Actor category tends to be one of the more crowded categories come Oscar time, and 2008 looks to be no exception. To be sure, there are a handful of frontrunners as usual, but hovering behind them are another group, more than eight who could easily sneak in and nab a nomination. Last year Tommy Lee Jones was nominated for his powerful work in “The Valley of Elah,” a richly deserved nod, but completely unexpected by the majority of prognosticators. I remember smiling when I heard his name read, but it was a huge surprise.
As regular readers may know, I’ve been yammering on about a Best Actress nomination for “Happy-Go-Lucky”‘s delightful Sally Hawkins since I
10. Richard Jenkins, “The Visitor”
From the press release:
Maybe mid-way through the Toronto Film Festival, two things are strikingly clear: Darren Aronofsky 

The 

I’ve never quite got a handle on what purpose the Hollywood Awards serve, since they frequently seem to honour achievements in still-unseen films. Their picks can be quite prescient (last year’s honorees included Marion Cotillard and Dante Ferretti), but they can frequently baffle too. (Based on “Charlie Wilson’s War,” did anyone really think that Stephen Goldblatt was the cinematographer of 2007?)
It may be Labor Day, but the work at hand is breathing down our necks. So it is that we come to the first weekly Oscar column of the new awards season.