The Best Actor category tends to be one of the more crowded categories come Oscar time, and 2008 looks to be no exception. To be sure, there are a handful of frontrunners as usual, but hovering behind them are another group, more than eight who could easily sneak in and nab a nomination. Last year Tommy Lee Jones was nominated for his powerful work in “The Valley of Elah,” a richly deserved nod, but completely unexpected by the majority of prognosticators. I remember smiling when I heard his name read, but it was a huge surprise.
I would expect something similar this year, as we have some of the great actors and potentially stunning performances in contention.
The obvious frontrunner at this point is Mickey Rourke, basking in the attention being given to “The Wrestler.” His performance is nothing short of miraculous, an astounding piece of acting, and it is great to see him back in the fold. But when it comes to winning the award, I have to say: not a chance. Rourke is intensely disliked in Hollywood. He’s seen as someone who basically spit on the industry to walk away and become a boxer. As a friend close to Rourke said, “A lot of people were happy when he left and don’t want this guy back.”
Frank Langella looks to be terrific in the trailers for “Frost/ Nixon.” He has always been a great actor, better known for his stage work than film, though in the last few years he has become a formidable presence on the big screen. I remember seeing him as “Dracula” both on stage and on film in the late 1970s and hoped he would go far. He did, just not in the movies, until recently.
Kris has Michael Sheen down as a lead actor possibility as well, and I agree. It’s one of those “Amadeus” situations where one performance cannot exist without the other. There is a strong chance that if the film and the actors are terrific, both of them will be nominated, though Langella certainly has the showier role of the two.
(more…)