OK, I explained the deal with this yesterday, when I covered the technical categories. What follows are the names and films that I, in a perfect world, would like to hear announced by Sid Ganis and Forest Whitaker bright and early tomorrow morning. (Or tomorrow afternoon, in my case … living across the Atlantic does have occasional advantages.)
Once more, my personal ballot takes no notice of Academy rules, eligibility squabbles, or whether or not anyone believes they have a shot in hell. For me, they simply represent the finest achievements I saw in 2008, with all the subjectivity that entails. Feel free to argue, or share your own distant hopes for tomorrow — however faint — in the comments.
Best Picture
“The Class”
“Gomorrah”
“I’ve Loved You So Long”
“Synecdoche, New York”
“Wendy and Lucy”
OK, so this won’t comes a surprise to anyone who read my Best of 2008 list, but these remain for me the year’s five most clear-cut masterworks. I’ve already made the case for each of these nominees at greater length, but for now, let me say that they are all notably linked by their startling humanity and strength of characterisation. The Academy will inevitably focus on works more formally elaborate than most of those listed here, but from where I’m standing, none were more emotionally rewarding. (As it happens, my honourable mentions here get their due in the next category.)
Best Director
Laurent Cantet, “The Class”
Matteo Garrone, “Gomorrah”
Mike Leigh, “Happy-Go-Lucky”
Steve McQueen, “Hunger”
Kelly Reichardt, “Wendy and Lucy”
No slight intended to my two Best Picture nominees not cited here, but two Brits at opposite ends of their filmmaking careers provided some of the year’s most fearless, idiosyncratic direction. Mike Leigh’s highly unorthodox, improvisatory technique may be common knowledge by now, but that doesn’t make it any less miraculous: the manner in which he orchestrates disparate, frequently disorganised vignettes into a wholly unified thesis on the human condition is something few others could achieve.
McQueen, meanwhile, was the year’s most exciting discovery, matching a stunning visual sensibility with a surprising intuitiveness as to when to hold back and shift the spotlight to his performers. Space doesn’t allow for a fair discussion of Reichardt’s no-nonsense poetry, Garrone’s limber juggling of multiple narratives or my probable winner Cantet’s impeccable perceptiveness and timing. And in a tight shortlist of six, Charlie Kaufman only really lost out because I expect him to move on to even greater accomplishments.
Best Actor
Mathieu Amalric, “A Christmas Tale”
Francois Begaudeau, “The Class”
Michael Fassbender, “Hunger”
Sean Penn, “Milk”
Mickey Rourke, “The Wrestler”
If, as I’ve remarked before, it wasn’t the best of years for cinema, the art of film acting was rather better served, and this powerhouse selection of male star turns proves it. Three of them exist of the centre of generous performance showcases: Mickey Rourke clearly pulled on a lifetime of personal disappoinment nd brute physicality to craft a character destined for the history books, while Sean Penn and Michael Fassbender each overcame my personal indifference to biopic performances by looking inward to create a person, as opposed to a portrait.
For the last two slots, I look to two very different French ensemble pieces. Begaudeau put the lie to the notion that playing oneself is in any way easy, reflecting and conducting his fellow non-professional cast members in a richly layered performance, while Amalric was a razor-sharp presence, cutting through the chaos of “A Christmas Tale” with true movie-star panache. In a very deep field, props are also due to Colin Farrell, Philip Seymour Hoffman (for “Synecdoche”), Richard Jenkins and Leonardo DiCaprio.
Best Actress
Sally Hawkins, “Happy-Go-Lucky”
Melissa Leo, “Frozen River”
Kristin Scott Thomas, “I’ve Loved You So Long”
Michelle Williams, “Wendy and Lucy”
Elsa Zylberstein, “I’ve Loved You So Long”
Thrillingly, there was no less richness and diversity to be found in this year’s female contenders, as the year threw up an unusually large selection of actress-driven projects. Four of these I could jot down without needing to go over my notes: you’ve already heard me wax lyrical over the staggering poise of Kristin Scott Thomas, the heartbreaking restraint of Michelle Williams (who surely takes my informal prize for best body of work in 2008), and the kaleidoscopic range of Sally Hawkins — the latter a performance that keeps presenting new facets to me.
Meanwhile, Melissa Leo grabbed her first film lead with the laid-bare ferocity of an actor given a once-in-a-lifetime shot, proving, as some of us already knew, that she’s a truly great actress. The fifth slot presented a number of options, but I ultimately decided to promote Elsa Zylberstein from the supporting category, for so bravely responding to, and filling the silences of, her on-screen sister. She narrowly places ahead of finely etched work by Tilda Swinton in “Julia” and fellow Frenchwomen Catherine Deneuve (“A Christmas Tale”) and Juliette Binoche (“Flight of the Red Balloon”).
Best Supporting Actor
Josh Brolin, “Milk”
Brendan Gleeson, “In Bruges”
Heath Ledger, “The Dark Knight”
Eddie Marsan, “Happy-Go-Lucky”
Frederic Pierrot, “I’ve Loved You So Long”
Probably the least populated of this year’s acting categories, which is not to say that the notable work that did present itself was somehow lacking. Much as I like to avoid the obvious, only the most contrarian of viewers could fail to respond to Heath Ledger’s mammoth incarnation of the Joker. Channelling Hannibal Lecter and Jack Lemmon in equal measure, the ultimate testament to this performance is that it feels like it’s been around forever.
No less riveting for me, however, was Marsan’s taut, tense, tragic inhabitation of a hate-fuelled nobody, while Josh Brolin located devastating internal conflicts in a slightly flatly written character. Gleeson and Pierrot both earn spots for their dignity and humour in portraying characters weary of life itself, and for supporting their commanding co-stars in the most literal and generous of ways. Michael Shannon came this close to my list, while Ralph Fiennes (“In Bruges”) and Gianfelice Imparato (“Gomorrah”) were very much in the mix.
Best Supporting Actress
Patricia Clarkson, “Elegy”
Samantha Morton, “Synecdoche, New York”
Kate O’Flynn, “Happy-Go-Lucky”
Marisa Tomei, “The Wrestler”
Michelle Williams, “Synecdoche, New York”
I surprised myself in this category, both with the unexpectedly large pool of talent I wound up considering, as well as with some of the choices I finally felt compelled to make. The fact that I disliked “Elegy” intensely didn’t detract from the luminous grace, wit and sensuality Clarkson brought to her extended cameo in the film — a masterclass in crafting a silk purse from a sow’s ear of a character. Tomei’s character may have been more sharply written, but she still deserves bouquets for the terseness and candour with which she dodges the “tart with a heart” stereotype.
It was obvious that “Synecdoche”‘s dazzling female ensemble would be in play here, and while Morton’s aching vulnerability made for one of the year’s most complex performances, I was also impressed by Williams’ sweet-to-bitter polarities. Finally, in a film bursting with lovely miniature characterisations, O’Flynn was a tiny but invaluably pithy comic presence as the protagonist’s sardonic younger sister. I can’t believe that doesn’t allow room for the exquisite Hiam Abbass (“The Visitor”) or the ladies of “Vicky Cristina Barcelona,” but there you go.
Best Original Screenplay
Arnaud Desplechin and Emmanuel Bourdieu, “A Christmas Tale”
Mike Leigh, “Happy-Go-Lucky”
Martin McDonagh, “In Bruges”
Philippe Claudel, “I’ve Loved You So Long”
Charlie Kaufman, “Synecdoche, New York”
An exciting field this year, spanning both the sprawling, heady multi-character study of “A Christmas Tale” and the considerably more disciplined domestic drama of “I’ve Loved You So Long,” both to equally elegant effect. Meanwhile, two of the most distinctive writers in the business came up trumps once more: Kaufman poured his soul into his most complicated, self-reflexive work yet, while Mike Leigh’s purported freewheeling improv-based scripting belies the immense cleverness and specificity of his language. Finally, “In Bruges” combined genre-oriented jokiness with literary artfulness to announce a fierce new voice in Martin McDonagh. Honourable mentions: “Frozen River,” “The Wrestler,” “Summer Hours” and “Vicky Cristina Barcelona.”
Best Adapted Screenplay
Francois Begaudeau, Robin Campillo and Laurent Cantet, “The Class”
Roberto Saviano, Maurizio Braucci, Ugo Chiti, Gianni Di Gregorio, Matteo Garrone and Massimo Gaudioso, “Gomorrah”
Elisabeth Perceval, “Heartbeat Detector”
Justin Haythe, “Revolutionary Road”
Kelly Reichardt and Jonathan Raymond, “Wendy and Lucy”
A disappointingly thin field this year, but the achievements of Begaudeau and Saviano (not to mention their respective co-writers) in reconceptualising their respective true-life experiences and investigations for the screen stood head and shoulders above the rest; in particular, the fusion of organised narrative and spontaneous conversation in “The Class” expanded the possibilities of adaptation.
Elsewhere, “Wendy and Lucy” spun an impressively affecting, full-bodied character arc from the wispiest of sources, and while I confess I haven’t read the novel that inspired “Heartbeat Detector,” it was still one fascinating head-trip of a screenplay. Finally, “Revolutionary Road” may not have full caught every social resonance of Richard Yates’ magnificent novel, Haythe deserves credit for the ingenuity with which he realised two deeply internalised characters.
Best Foreign Language Film
“The Class”
“Gomorrah”
“Heartbeat Detector”
“Il Divo”
“I’ve Loved You So Long”
A category that wouldn’t exist in a perfect world, but since the point of this post is to replicate the Academy’s template, there you have it. To be honest, since the majority of the Best Picture slate also falls under this category, it would make more sense to have a Best English Language Film category — in which case, congrats to “Happy-Go-Lucky,” “Hunger,” “In Bruges, “Synecdoche, New York” and “Wendy and Lucy.”
Best Documentary Feature
“Citizen Havel”
“Man on Wire”
“My Winnipeg”
“Of Time and the City”
“Trouble the Water”
I confess to not having seen some of the year’s most-discussed titles in this category, but then most people didn’t see the fascinating, impossibly intimate political portrait “Citizen Havel” either, so it balances out. Elsewhere, while I didn’t think “Man on Wire” was the field-slaying achievement the precursors would have you believe, it was still a grandly entertaining piece of work, while “Trouble the Water” manages its own high-wire feat of balancing the personal and the rhetorical in its unique investigation of a well-covered tragedy. Rounding out the category are two vividly impressionistic works from the auteur gallery: Guy Maddin’s elliptical, haunting “My Winnipeg” and Terence Davies’ soaring Liverpool study “Of Time and the City” are both deeply felt valentines to their creators’ respective home territories.
Best Animated Feature
“WALL-E”
“Waltz With Bashir”
The Academy has been known to reduce one of its three-strong categories to a lean field of two. So, not having seen the Tapley-endorsed “Bolt,” nor having been greatly impressed by anything else in the medium this year, I exercise that right here. I’ve already made my affection for “WALL-E” quite clear, and while “Waltz With Bashir” remains one of those frustrating works that I greatly admire without being able to love, its bold visual beauty and thematic courage cannot be denied.
So, that’s the lot. I don’t expect to be discussing a lot of these names after tomorrow’s announcement, but for those that miss out, I hope the ringing endorsement of a lowly London-based blogger is some consolation.
For those who like playing the numbers game, after yesterday’s tech ballot, that leaves “Synecdoche, New York” as my top nominee with 8 mentions, while “The Class,” “I’ve Loved You So Long,” “Happy-Go-Lucky,” “The Wrestler” and “The Dark Knight” all manage 6 apiece. Oh, would that were the case tomorrow.
Comments
24 responses to “My dream ballot: part two”
I haven’t seen Synecdoche NY (and I very much want to) but wow to a lot of these. Wendy and Lucy? If anything it would’ve made a “Best Short Film” list had they had the foreknowledge to make it 20 minutes long, which is just about how long the film would’ve had to have been to have remained interesting based on the content within it.
So, is “Wendy And Lucy”, in tone and style, anything like Agnes Varda’s “Vagabond”, Guy?
I probably won’t see it until it makes it to DVD.
I see where you’re coming from with that comparison, JC, but stylistically they’re quite different. “Wendy and Lucy” is a more linear (not meant pejoratively), cleanly structured work, gentler and more lyrical in tone.
That said, it’s been a while since I saw “Vagabond,” and the clear thematic/character parallels hadn’t occurred to me. I should give it another look.
[…] unknown Filed under Acting News […]
Ah Guy, I love you for putting Mathieu Amalric on that best actor list. He’s brilliant, and it’s a crime he wasn’t nominated last year for The Diving Bell and the Butterfly. I also love the inclusion of Samantha Morton, who’s unbelievably brilliant in every film (Especially in Mister Lonely).
Melissa Leo should have been nominated for 21 Grams. If she and Sally Hawkins are left out tomorrow morning I will not be pleased.
Your taste seems to have a fairly contrarian bent to it, celebrating talent you view as being overlooked or unconsidered rather than a larger comparison of the best. Considering that most of the movies you forefront didn’t even play outside of LA and New York and maybe a sprinkling of other screens I – as an obsessive movie-goer from the pretty darn metropolitain city of Seattle – can’t really evaluate your claims very well. But I’m suspicious of anyone who chooses almost exclusively movies no one else can see because they only play at film festivals. I’m certain there are excellent movies at film festivals that fall through the cracks but there are also excellent movies that can make at least nominal enough returns to warrent playing on one screen in Peoria for one week in a year. I think sometimes film critics try to pick movies no one else can talk about because they want to sound – and in fact think of themselves – as above it all. They’re not. They’re just fan boys of a particular style and sound about as out of touch as someone at a comic book convention who swears that the best movies of the year were The Dark Knight, Iron Man and Hell Boy.
Wendy and Lucy is much better than Vagabond because it’s more contained and focused. It also has a better sense of place and circumstance whereas Vagabond seemed to be all about encounters.
Great to see Patricia Clarkson’s underappreciated performance from “Elegy” get some love. She was, as always, superb.
Duly noted, Chad.
Overall, a brilliant list but I still think Kate Winslet is better in Revolutionary Road than Michelle Williams was in Wendy and Lucy, but still a good list.
Henry: Not being contrarian — I genuinely believe this is the best the year had to offer. I know it’s heavy on arthouse fare, but that’s largely because I think this was a lousy year for mainstream cinema.
Of all the blockbuster titles, only “WALL-E” and, to a lesser extent, “The Dark Knight” really fired my imagination — but not quite enough to crack my top categories.
Meanwhile, I was disappointed to varying degrees by a lot of the late-year awards fare, including “Button,” “Milk” and “Revolutionary Road.” I loved “Slumdog” when I saw it, but it hasn’t stuck with me as much as others.
I’m sorry you haven’t been able to see a lot the films I mention, but I’m offended that you think I’m being wilfully or snobbishly obtuse.
Every year is different, and sometimes mainstream cinema rules for me: “The Departed” was far and away my top film of 2006, while 2003 was all about “Kill Bill: Vol. 1.” This year, it was the smaller films, particularly from Europe, that really resonated with me. You can’t tell your heart what to love.
I love you. Phenomenal choices throughout. Just phenomenal.
Ralph Fiennes is so without love. :(
Ok, slightly OT and this might be a dumb question, what channel are the nominations going to be on tomorrow morning?
Does anyone know what station I can watch the announcement on tomorrow morning?
Not entirely without love, Emily… I gave him an honourable mention for Best Supporting Actor!
I’m not in the US, so I don’t know about channels, but surely they’re televised on any news network? I know CNN shows them.
You did give him an honourable mention, and I thank you.
Also, according to the guide on my tv, one of the many hours of Anderson Cooper will be on from 5-6 tomorrow on CNN.
I read that last year it was on ABC. But I don’t think it is this year? GAH, I need to know!
Synecdoche was truly amazing. One thought that pervaded my mind afterwords was that if T.S. Eliot were to ever make a movie, this would be it. The levels it speaks on seem to never end. This was definitely the only movie this year that gave me that awed feeling of what the human mind is capable of.
And on a side note, of course he is a great, great actor, but does anyone else think that virtually every movie he appears in his great. I think you could definitely argue that his filmography is the most impressive out of any actor ever, especially considering the various types of movies and roles he is in.
I’m in the states (New York, to be exact) and I’m pretty sure the nominations will be around 8:30 am. Last year I watched Good Morning America cut to a live feed of the nominations in LA. So I would assume it would be the same drill this year.
Thank you!!
I’m going to be in school.. :(
Maybe there’s a live feed somewhere.
I’ll refer to one classic line from The Wrestler:
“Use my leg! Use my leg!!”
Scott: I assume you’re talking about Philip Seymour Hoffman? He does have a strong filmography, though I think it’s a wild exaggeration to say that virtually every film he’s been in has been great. (Exceptions off the top of my head: “Charlie Wilson’s War,” “Along Came Polly,” “Red Dragon,” “MI3″…)
But hey, it’s hard to name an actor whose resume is dud-free.
What Michele Williams does in Wendy & Lucy is so extra-ordinary, you forget you are watching a movie. “performance” almost sounds vulgar to describe how entirely unaffected and natural she is in the film. For my money, it is the greatest achievement in acting all year (but I’m yet to see the Wrestler). For the female acting prize, it would be a toss up between her & Hawkins but it seems the Oscars will ignore both.
Again its one of those years where the Oscar nominees will not even remotely reflect the good cinema the year has to offer.
“Revolutionary Road” has no business being anywhere near a list for the best in screenplay. The script was the ultimate undoing of this otherwise brilliantly acted, directed, crafted, and realized work. The narrative was disjointed. The dialogue was contrived, bordering on the absurd. Characters seemed unjustified in the majority of their actions. In my opinion, it was one of the WORST scripts I’ve seen developed onto the screen in quite some time (though to be fair, I don’t watch “bad” movies too often).