I guess it’s alright. Sort of reminds us of the stage production’s materials. Sadly there isn’t a larger version available yet.
Remember to check the latest on “Frost/Nixon” here.
(Courtesy: Entertainment Weekly)
I guess it’s alright. Sort of reminds us of the stage production’s materials. Sadly there isn’t a larger version available yet.
Remember to check the latest on “Frost/Nixon” here.
(Courtesy: Entertainment Weekly)
Comments
15 responses to “‘Frost/Nixon’ poster”
i actually like this. despite taking the face and a half method we’ve seen so many times, i like the look of it. almost a throwback to the look of tv in the stories contemporary 70s. also glad they gave Frost the “spotlight” i guess. in the trailer it looked like frost was the lead and nixon looked a little bit like a supporting character. lets see if that the way the studio pushes
Am I alone in thinking Sheen looks a little silly? Or more than a little silly?
It’s the faces again… Looks like we’ve got two more nominees in place. ; )
I’m with JAB. Sheen looks like he’s on the poster for “Critters 4” or “Monkey Shines” in the 80’s.
I think this is awful. The whole thing — typeface, lighting, colour scheme — is weirdly 1980s.
It’s a wholly 70s/80s style poster and Sheen really looks possessed in it. Makes for a great bargain bin dvd-c0ver though :D.
Sheen looks out of place, something doesn’t seem right.
Bad poster.
I actually think its okay. Though one thing I find interesting is that in earlier UK material and on the trailer’s credits Sheen is billed first while Langella is billed first here, maybe they switched the order of billing for different countries based on who was more well known in each.
400 million people were waiting for the truth? What? Who?! I’m so confused
Ever heard of a little thing called Watergate, AJ?
Seriously, the poster’s not at fault there. Do some research.
I think AJ might be referring to the number, since it’s obviously not the population of the U.S. at that point in time, nor was it the population of the world. The populations of U.S. and the U.K. combined?
I know what Watergate is, but the number seems a little random.
No, the combined population can’t be right, which I probably should have realized at the time. The number of people who watched the interview? Seems awfully high. Am I missing something obvious?
I saw the trailer for this yesterday….I am very excited.
Liz: the number refers to the worldwide TV audience. (Interest would have extended far beyond the US and the UK, after all.) The figure is mentioned in the play, and I assume in the film too.