As a few commenters have been discussing elsewhere, it seems that some supposedly attentive Oscar bloggers figure 2008 to be a weak year for the lead actress race. We’ve been calling it the most competitive derby in years around these parts for quite a while now, so the notion that anyone would find it to be thin is perplexing to say the least.
Well, I’m happy today to see that Pete Hammond is on our bandwagon, writing the following at his Notes on a Season blog:
This year, however, it is already clear that the race, for all intents and purposes, is backloaded with the most imposing and competitive list of genuine best actress possibilities in many years.
A tsunami is coming, and [Melissa] Leo and [Penélope] Cruz are getting out of the way by taking their best shot now, hoping it’s enough to stay alive when the big storm of contenders hits shore.
He then launches into a laundry list of contenders, all of them thoroughly covered before.
We’re currently banking on Kristin Scott Thomas, Angelina Jolie, Kate Winslet and Meryl Streep around these parts. Those are four slots that seem secure. After that, it’s a toss-up between Anne Hathaway, Melissa Leo, Penélope Cruz, Michelle Williams and Sally Hawkins in the indie sector. If it’s not an indie performance the AMPAS wants to recognize, they’ll have high-budget fare to choose from in Cate Blanchett and Nicole Kidman.
I’m sticking with Kidman for now. Makes as much sense as any other contender.
Have your say. Who are you predicting for Best Actress right now?
Sony Pictures Classics is the first studio to send out Academy screeners this season. “Frozen River,” which garnered
Wow, what a damn fine year for lead actress performances. When was the last time you heard anyone say that?
So far, 2008 hasn’t presented a surfeit of cast-iron Best Actress contenders. (Consider that by this time last year, we all knew Marion Cotillard and Julie Christie were locks.)
All us awards-watchers know that Tom O’Neil’s Oscar prognostications can be a little wacky (let’s just forget that he