In Contention

Tag: Alan Moore

  • Neil Gaiman pens a love letter send-off to the Caped Crusader

    Cover of Batman #686I don’t know how many readers became regulars as a result of last year’s “Dark Knight” awards march, but I do know there are quite a few who share my enthusiasm for comics and Batman comics in particular.  This post is certainly aimed at that crowd, but anyone eager to get their hands on a great story, in any medium, this is for you, too.

    With the 70th anniversary of the character coming next month, author, screenwriter and comics scribe Neil Gaiman has been charged with writing up the final chapter of Batman’s existence in the books as we’ve known them throughout that history.  “Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader?” is his “love letter” to the Bat, fashioned after Alan Moore’s similar send-off to Superman 20 years ago: “Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?”

    Wired recently posted an in-depth interview with Gaiman, already high off the successful adaptation of his novel “Coraline” this year, and you get some great insight into his off-the-wall graphic denouement, which culminates with a sequence at once touching and unsettling, an homage of sorts to the finale of Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey.”  Asked whether the character has lived in his heart for a while, given the deep attention and appreciation for his history in just two swift volumes, Gaiman had this to say:

    When I was 5, I was in a car with my dad and he mentioned that there was this Batman TV show in America about a man who dressed up in a costume and fought crime. The only bat I ever knew was a cricket bat, so what I thought he looked like was rather odd, based on that. Months later, the series hit the U.K., and I remember watching and being affected by it. Really worrying, genuinely worrying, on a deep primal level, “Will he be OK?” That is the way it was with every deathtrap. If I missed the end of an episode, I’d get my friends to tell me he was OK.

    Because of the Batman TV show, my dad picked up Smash! comics for me, which reprinted a Batman cartoon strip, which were much more about continuity than the television program. Those were my gateway drugs into Batman. Even when batman went twee in the ’60s, Neal Adams reinvented him as a long-eared, shadowy character. And when I was in my 20s, Frank Miller’s Dark Knight Returns came out and I found myself writing my first piece of academic criticism on it.

    I wanted my comic to contain all of that, from the story to the art. I wanted it to have that love in there. I wanted to write the last Batman with honor and love.

    If you haven’t read these two books, I encourage you to do so, even if you aren’t up to snuff on what’s going on in the series at the moment.  It reads as an independent study of the Dark Knight’s final hour.  You can find “Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader?” in the pages of “Batman” (#686) and “Detective Comics” (#853).  And catch the rest of that Wired interview here.

  • Different strokes

    Alan Moore

    “Did you hear My Chemical Romance’s pop punk cover of Dylan’s ‘Desolation Row’ over the film’s end credits? It illustrates the same point. Each version follows the same chords and same lyrics, but as done by Dylan, the song is a classic. As done by My Chemical Romance, it’s a disposable piece of junk.”

    “Pop punk is as different from folk as film is from the graphic novel, as animation is from live action, etc. The chords and lyrics that resonate in one form won’t in another. Play Moonlight Sonata on a piano and its beautiful. Play it on a clarinet, not so much. In a similar way, an ink brush and a movie camera are different instruments. Snyder tries to hit most of the same beats and uses the same words that work in the graphic novel, but they don’t resonate on screen.”

    A pair of insightful comments from a guy calling himself Kyle_D at Hollywood Elsewhere, perhaps indicating how “Watchmen” misses the mark a bit more succinctly that I did yesterday.

    Also, from Geoff Boucher’s September 2008 interview with Alan Moore re: the then upcoming “Watchmen” adaptation:

    “Moore said that with ‘Watchmen,’ he told the epic tale of a large number of characters over decades of history with ‘a range of techniques’ that cannot be translated to the movie screen…”

    A week ago, I’d have said “bullshit” to that.

  • Fearful symmetry

    (from left) Malin Akerman and Patrick Wilson in Watchmen(I was going to hold onto this and some more stuff until the beginning of the week, but we’re ready to go so let’s hit it during the weekend.)

    I’m not one of those guys who says this work or that cannot be filmed.  I don’t share the arrogance that demands faithful representation of a beloved piece of literature on the screen, and even with my own devotion to comic books and, of course, Alan Moore’s “Watchmen,” I always thought there was a great movie in there waiting to be unleashed.

    I think it was Quentin Tarantino who once said he would never translate a comic book to the screen because there are just too many damn people to please.  There’s some truth there, mixed with a little pomposity.  I had Zack Snyder’s back.  I enjoyed “Dawn of the Dead” enough and was one of “300”’s few serious vocal champions.  I would have preferred a director with a penchant for grit take up the reins on “Watchmen” but I found myself curiously okay with the stylized ballet Snyder seemed to be interested in creating.

    But in a nutshell, “Watchmen” damn near stole my faith in movies.  Maybe that’s a stretch, but come on, it’s all up there on the screen.  Minus a climax that was likely changed for the better given what will and won’t work in a film, every inch of Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’s hard work is laid out for us at 24 frames per second.  And you know what?  It doesn’t work.  And we can’t say anyone involved in the production botched the adaptation because it’s faithful to a fault.

    I think we can blame the woeful, stomach-churning, cringe-worthy failure that this is on the frothing-at-the-mouth fandom that scared Snyder and company away from being creative, from understanding the value of compositing (a tactic Christopher Nolan has so expertly employed with the Batman franchise) and from, at best, realizing that the tone we manifest in our minds as we flip through a work of graphic fiction can’t be satisfied by lifting nearly every inch of hard-boiled, wordy (if eloquent) narration.  God bless him for trying to please them all, but what they wanted ain’t art.

    “Watchmen” is an awful, awful film.

    (more…)

  • The LA Times’ comic/genre/superhero blog?

    Did anyone else totally miss the last three months of the Los Angeles Times’ “Hero Complex” blog?  I had no idea it even existed until I stumbled across the Alan Moore story we linked ot this morning in the round-up.  Weird.  Guess I’ve got a new blog to frequent…

  • 9/19 Oscarweb Round-up

    Benicio Del Toro• Peter Sciretta wraps up the Toronto Fest, live from Fantastic Fest.  It’s that time of the year… [/Film]

    • Oscar winner Diablo Cody responds to the haters: “I like my fake name.  It’s engraved on an Oscar.  Yours isn’t.” [MySpace]

    • Mark Olsen apparently reported over a week ago that Kathryn Bigelow’s “The Hurt Locker” will not be released by Summit Entertainment until 2009 and no one knew about it. [Los Angeles Times]

    • The news kind of sucks for Sasha Stone’s latest Oscar column thesis… [Awards Daily]

    • …while it seems a questionable move to Jeffrey Wells. [Hollywood Elsewhere]

    • Jeffrey Anderson runs down the best of Keira Knightley’s costume epics. [Cinematical]

    • Kevin Kelly talks to “Waltz with Bashir” star/director Ari Folman. [Spout Blog]

    • Lou Lumenick wonders if Heath Ledger’s legacy can equal that of James Dean beyond the inevitable Oscar nomination and Halloween get-ups (I know that’s my costume this year…the only reason I haven’t cut my hair since May). [Lumenick on Film]

    • Karl Rozemeyer talks to “Appaloosa” star Viggo Mortensen… [Premiere]

    • …as well as “Che” star Benicio Del Toro. [Premiere]

    • Alan Moore will be “spitting venom all over” Zack Snyder’s “Watchmen.” [Hero Complex]

  • The ‘geek’ review

    Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight(Read the official “Dark Knight” review here.)

    Alright, now that most audiences have begun filing out of cinemas across the country, I figure it is time to offer up The Geek Review of “The Dark Knight.”

    Bear in mind, this review/column/joygasm will be filled with spoilers. If you want to go into the film fresh (as indeed you should — despite the overall lack of major surprises), then steer clear. Most of the spoilerish stuff I’ll save for after the jump, but for now, I’d like to get into the filmmakers’ handling of the source material.

    Christopher Nolan and company have always been aware of the necessity for being faithful to the seven decades of material available to them when digging into this franchise. What has kept the series fresh and not simply a cut-and-paste effort has been a willingness to test those fan-set boundaries and still get away with some rather brazen decisions.

    “Batman Begins” was filled to the brim with such instances: Utilizing Ra’s al Ghul as a creation point of sorts for the Batman. Introducing a love interest previously absent from the canon and revealing Batman’s secret identity to her. Destroying Wayne Manor. Etc.

    With that in mind, “The Dark Knight” has its fair share of departures that still work in the hyper-real-world setting of the franchise, and, presumably, will be allowed to pass, if not cheered outright by fans seeing the film this weekend.

    Spoilers coming! You have been warned!

    (more…)