Features







2007-08 Oscar Calendar



[Monday, December 3, 2007]

Official Screen Credits
Forms Due.


[Wednesday, December 26, 2007]

Nominations ballots mailed.


[Saturday, January 12, 2008]

Nominations polls close
5 p.m. PST.


[Tuesday, January 22, 2008]

Nominations announced
5:30 a.m. PST
Samuel Goldwyn Theater


[Wednesday, January 30, 2008]

Final ballots mailed.


[Monday, February 4, 2008]

Nominees Luncheon


[Saturday, February 9, 2008]

Scientific and Technical
Awards Dinner


[Tuesday, February 19, 2008]

Final polls close 5 p.m. PST.


[Sunday, February 24, 2008]

79th Annual
Academy Awards Presentation
Kodak Theatre

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2


« October 2006 | Main | December 2006 »

November 30, 2006

"Tech Support": Best Music - Volume I

jaws.jpg


Can you even begin to imagine Steven Spielberg’s “Jaws” without John Williams’s chugging theme? I bet you can’t. Williams’s creation of a character – the shark – through music is just one example of how, when utilized creatively and to its full extent, original music can bring a film to a level it never would have reached otherwise.


The music branch in the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences gives out two awards each year – Best Original Score and Best Original Song. The former is one of the more high profile “tech” races on Oscar night. Precursor awards-dishing organizations like the BFCA and the HFPA give out awards for original score, and in recent years, the Academy has specifically showcased the five nominees for this award as they have done for directors and actors. I consider that a nice touch.


The category is nevertheless one of the most difficult to predict. Year after year, the branch seems to care little about what the precursors say. Nominees in the category tend to be an interesting mix of blockbusters, comedies, Best Picture nominees and serious-minded films not included in the Best Picture race.


CONTINUE READING "TECH SUPPORT"

November 28, 2006

Standing corrected by The Carpetbagger

littleyellow.jpg


In yesterday's Oscar column, I mentioned that "Little Miss Sunshine" directors Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Farris wouldn't have a shot at a nomination in the Best Director category due to both names being credited at the helm. This was an assumption on my part based in part on DGA strictures (recalling the hub-bu surrounding Robert Rodriguez, Frank Miller and "Sin City") and last year's disqualification of the "Batman Begins" score due to two credited composers.


Well it seems I was wrong in that assumption, and perhaps should have made a few quick and easy calls like New York Times columnist and blogger David Carr (a.k.a. "The Carpetbagger") did. It seems there is no rule that would keep both directors from grabbing a nomination, and, as quoted Academy spokesman Jon Pavlik points out, Robert Wise and Jerome Robbins were both nominated in 1961 for "West Side Story," eventually winning the award.


A big "oops" on my part and a big thanks to Mr. Carr for clearing that one up. A good thing all around regardless. "Little Miss Sunshine" is one of the best films of the year, and Dayton and Farris deserve they're due.


PARTNERS PANNING FOR GOLD (The Carpetbagger)

Ryan Gosling: The In Contention Interview

half1.jpg


Ryan Gosling is a smooth customer. Lacking pretension so much that one can’t even find a hint of his intending to steer clear of it, the actor recently celebrated his 26th birthday on November 12th. This following a year that has seen his directorial debut come to pre-production light, a coveted spot amongst GQ’s annual “Men of the Year” issue and, oh yeah, one of the most acclaimed performances of 2006.


The critically hailed star of “The Believer” and “The Notebook,” Gosling finds himself in the thick of the year’s awards race for his riveting portrayal in Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck’s “Half Nelson.” The film received five Independent Film Spirit award nominations this morning, including Best Male Lead for Gosling.


Greeting me via telephone from Toronto, where he is nearing the end of principle photography on Craig Gillespe’s “Lars and the Real Girl,” the actor seems to have tripped over his sister’s computer chord and is having some trouble with the usual “hellos.” It’s all for the best, really, because when you have a conversation with Ryan Gosling, the last thing you want to do is bog things down in formalities. Gosling is a real guy, attracted to real ideas and, above all else, real characters.

“I had read the script and thought it was about people I had met, people I knew or was like in some way,” he says. “When I go to the movies, I want to feel like I’ve met someone. People who do things out of character, who don’t have a clear character arc, those are the people I’m interested in seeing in a film.”


half2.jpg


In “Half Nelson,” Gosling stars as Dan Dunne, a charismatic junior high school history teacher in a drab and dismal Brooklyn neighborhood. Dan’s professional environment is one of enlightenment for his pupils. He captures the spark of their educational hunger and even finds time to coach the girls’ basketball team. But personal demons can haunt even the saintliest of souls, and Dan’s crutch is drug addiction. The allure of the crack pipe frequently pulls him away from the buoyancy he works so hard to construct for his students, dragging him through the realities of crushed idealism.


In some ways not the most sympathetic of individuals, Dan provided for Gosling a character of tangibility and truthfulness.


“I think you have to love and hate the characters you play,” he says. “They’re people. It’s not as simple as sympathizing with them.”


To prepare for the role, Gosling moved to New York for one month before shooting even began, immersing himself in the life of his character. He lived in a small apartment in Brooklyn and spent time shadowing 8th grade teacher David Easton. Speaking matter-of-factly about his methods, Gosling mentions, “There’s a million ways to get there, but it’s a challenge when there’s no real reference for the people you play.”


What might also be considered a challenge for some actors is sharing the screen with untrained thespians. But Gosling seems to have found a preference of sorts, so much so that he plans on casting his upcoming directorial debut, “The Lord’s Resistance,” with non-actors across the board.


“I love working with non-actors,” he says. “Actors are so manipulative, and non-actors are not. They push you in ways that the best actors in the world can’t.”


half3.jpg


One such non-actor is Shareeka Epps, receiving equal praise for her portrayal of Drey in the film. One of Dan’s students who happens upon his secret early in the first act, Drey seems weathered and accustomed for her years, but exuberant and youthful all the same – qualities Gosling also found bursting out of his co-star.


“Shareeka has no reverence, which I really respected,” he explains. “She doesn’t approach any scene with any preciousness. She’s brutally honest and not ashamed of how she feels.”


Finding himself in the heat of contention for Best Actor consideration at this year’s Oscar ceremony, Gosling is predictably apathetic about the awards process. One almost doesn’t want to approach the subject with him, given the expected response from an actor so obviously concerned with the work above anything else. But this is a business of sound bites, and even the most apprehensive awards hopefuls can give you gold in that regard.


“It affects me,” he says of the Oscar race, “in the sense that I’m happy that a film that cost $500,000 can get to a point where this many people are aware of it. Awards – I don’t know who that’s up to, but I appreciate that the film is being received the way it is. I had one of the best experiences of my life on this. We never had to hit any marks. We never had to say anything twice or worry about continuity. You never felt like you were in a scene in a movie. A lot of directors never see it that way. Anna and Ryan have a great eye for the way that we are and the lies we tell about who we are, and that’s rare.”


half4.jpg


From here, Gosling will assuredly take it all in stride. The aforementioned “The Lord’s Resistance” is high on his list of priorities. Telling the story of the Lord’s Resistance militia in Uganda, the film looks to be another pointed political entry in the current canon of Africa-centralized cinema. Even still, don’t expect the actor to look too far ahead at the kinds of films he wishes to make, in front of or behind the camera. He holds such judgment to a case-by-case basis.


“I’ll have to wait until I’m tested,” he says. “Films I love have a certain allowance for accidents. When I was a kid, my favorite films were the ‘Abbot and Costello’ movies. I love Werner Herzog’s films, Terry Malick, John Cassavettes. But I’ve got a lot of things I want to do in my life, and not just acting. There’s no anxiety about not having enough time to do all the movies I want to do or anything, but I have to keep it interesting for myself. I don’t want to make the same movie over and over again.”

November 27, 2006

Switching Gears

letters3.jpg


It’s been a while since we’ve dug into a full blown Oscar column here at In Contention. This week, with a few more screenings behind us and a modest few on the horizon (“Apocalypto” Thursday, “The Good Shepherd” a week from today), it seems like something is in the air: change.


Perhaps it’s entirely subjective, as my review of “Dreamgirls” last week is admittedly in the minority, but it seems to me the Best Picture frontrunner isn’t the frontrunner at all anymore. It seems to me the race is opening up wider, and with Clint Eastwood’s “Letters from Iwo Jima” leaping into the fray, supposedly to save the hide of “Flags of Our Fathers,” maybe an entry of social importance and relative “prestige” can take the top prize away from a thin and emotionally distancing musical like we almost saw happen in 2002.

I mentioned Friday the widely floated idea that, had Harvey Weinstein not been in the mix on “Chicago,” Roman Polanski’s “The Pianist” would have dropped in and snatched the Best Picture win four years ago. Taking down victories in the adapted screenplay, lead actor and directing categories that night, it seemed things might have been heading that way for the Holocaust drama regardless of campaigns. “Chicago” was criticized in many corners as being a frigid affair – lots of glitz but not a lot of heart. And that’s fair enough, but then it wasn’t the sort of story that necessitated as much. “Dreamgirls” is much more dependant on viewer-character connectivity, and reading even the raves, I don’t see a lot of that going on. Just lots of praise for the showmanship.


dream7.jpg


Beyond “Dreamgirls,” the only largely agreed upon Best Picture shoo-in this year is Martin Scorsese’s “The Departed.” A hard boiled crime flick with no warm and fuzzy center in sight, the film may very well earn Scorsese his long-deserved Best Director trophy. But a win in the major race? You’d have to go back to “The French Connection” find something so aesthetically abrasive and genre-baked taking the top prize. It seems a stretch.


“The Queen” is considered a good bet for a nomination in many corners as well. One of the best reviewed films of the year, Stephen Frears’s intimate political portrait still seems a bit too small to take the Academy by storm as a Best Picture victor, wooing technical branches alongside assuredly impressed actors and writers.


“Little Miss Sunshine” is one of the most beloved films of the year that sadly won’t be turning up in the Best Director category due to two credited helmers. There's one mark against it. Plus, it’s just too light, even if it does hit the right emotional marks.


babelpitt.jpg


A few other films have a clear shot at making it into contention, but seem unlikely to win for various reasons. “Babel,” for instance, is too much of a love/hate affair, while “World Trade Center” doesn’t have the muscle or the wide-spread acclaim to threaten victory. Something else has to step forward.


“Flags of Our Fathers” really is down and out. It has been forgotten into oblivion, despite pretty FYC ads in the trades – a too little too late effort from Paramount marketing. The film also has the whiff of financial failure on it. On top of it all, the release of Eastwood’s sister film has been considered a move to revive hope in that structurally distressed endeavor. No film that needs the help of another studio’s release has the strength to survive something as vicious as an Oscar season.


An idea most seem to be passing over in all of this is that maybe “Letters from Iwo Jima” is the latter season surprise in and of itself – a film that can storm in with its big ideas, emotional resonance and intimate brushstrokes to steal the thunder of all pretenders.


letters2.jpg


Hardly anyone has seen “Letters” yet, so it is certainly worth admitting the sheer speculation of this column. But the gears are turning. The film opened to some good notices at the Tokyo International Film Festival last week, fit with a big story in the Los Angeles Times. The official website went live over the weekend, and, keep in mind, the film did make the deadline for HFPA consideration. So maybe in two weeks, should it make a dent in the Golden Globe nominations, prognosticators will start taking real notice.


Then again, maybe it will fade away and be a tiny blip on the Oscar landscape that exists as a modest crutch for “Flags” and is merely seen as part of a revered director’s brave creativity in 2006 – nothing more, nothing less. Nothing, regardless, can be certain.


I don’t know about you, but I smell something. I smell a studio oddly skimping on the campaign of a critically hailed gangster flick and steering its determination to something “they” think could steal the whole show. Did I mention Warners’s new awards consultant, Michelle Robertson, comes to the team this year following a healthy awards stint at Focus Features? Focus being a studio that specialized in the intimate and the prestigious for years – a studio that almost stole the whole show from a razzle-dazzle showcase four short years ago.


letters4.jpg


So yes, I’m out on a limb this week. You’ll find “Letters from Iwo Jima” is predicted across the board, every chart updated in full. That flimsy fifth Best Actor slot seems perfectly suited for Ken Watanabe. Newcomer Kazunari Ninomiya feels like just the sort to stake a last minute claim with his portrayal of Saigo, the apparent fulcrum of the film’s cast. The techs all look just as likely to follow suit. In short, “Letters from Iwo Jima” seems more and more like the real Clint Eastwood film of this one-two punch, the real awards hog. At the end of the day, maybe “Flags of Our Fathers” will be the true “crutch.”


(Please remember, chart rankings are always in order of nomination likelihood, not win likelihood.)


Main Category Charts
Technical Category Charts
Oscar Predictions Archive
"The Contenders"




Previous Oscar Columns:
10/23/06 - "Lighten Up"
10/16/06 - "Starting To Get Serious"
10/09/06 - "'Flags' Lands and the Supporting Actresses Need Sustenance"
10/02/06 - "What's in a lead anyway?"
09/18/06 - "Aftermath"
09/11/06 - "It's All Happening."
09/04/06 - "Aw, Canucks."
08/28/06 - "On Your Marks..."
08/14/06 - "Enough Foreplay!"
08/07/06 - "Don't Knock Masturbation; it's Sex with Someone I Love"
07/31/06 - "Old and New, the Oscar Season Approaches"

November 20, 2006

Charts!

I'm having a time getting Dreamweaver back up and running on my recently ressurrected computer, but I refuse to leave this site chartless for yet another week. So, after the jump, enjoy the rather barbaric formatting, but a chart's a chart. And I'm sticking my neck out here and there this week. Namely in Best Actor, where I think WB remains cuckoo for not declaring Leonardo DiCaprio, SCREAMING it, even, in the lead actor caegory. Their timidity is leaving a vacancy, and Aaron Eckhart is one hell of a charmer, as is the film he's in. I'm just sayin'...


The real thorn in my side this week is figuring out how "Letters from Iwo Jima" is going to play into this thing. It's said to be a smaller, more intimate film. We've all heard it's supposedly "better," but "Flags of Our Fathers" still has tech potential all over the place so who knows what'll happen. Are you pulling your hair out yet? I sure am.

Picture:


1. Dreamgirls
2. The Departed
3. The Queen
4. Little Miss Sunshine
5. World Trade Center
6. Babel
7. Letters from Iwo Jima
8. The Pursuit of Happyness
9. United 93
10. The Good Shepherd


Director:


1. Martin Scorsese
2. Bill Condon
3. Stephen Frears
4. Clint Eastwood
5. Alejandro Gonzalez Innaritu
6. Paul Greengrass
7. Oliver Stone
8. Alfonso Cuaron
9. Gabriele Muccino
10. Robert De Niro


Actor:


1. Peter O’Toole
2. Will Smith
3. Forest Whitaker
4. Ryan Gosling
5. Aaron Eckhart
6. Leonardo DiCaprio
7. Matt Damon
8. Derek Luke
9. Nicolas Cage
10. Jamie Foxx


Actress:


1. Helen Mirren
2. Judi Dench
3. Meryl Streep
4. Penelope Cruz
5. Annette Bening
6. Kate Winslet
7. Cate Blanchett
8. Beyonce Knowles
9. Naomi Watts
10. Renee Zellweger


Supporting Actor:


1. Jack Nicholson
2. Eddie Murphy
3. Alan Arkin
4. Michael Sheen
5. Brad Pitt
6. Steve Carrell
7. Jaden Smith
8. Ben Affleck
9. Michael Pena
10. Jackie Earle Haley


Supporting Actress:


1. Jennifer Hudson
2. Abigail Breslin
3. Adriana Barraza
4. Cate Blanchett
5. Rinko Kikuchi
6. Maggie Gyllenhaal
7. Shareeka Epps
8. Vera Farmiga
9. Emma Thompson
10. Jill Clayburgh


Adapted:


1. The Departed
2. Thank You for Smoking
3. Dreamgirls
4. Notes on a Scandal
5. The Painted Veil
6. Little Children
7. The Last King of Scotland
8. Children of Men
9. The Prestige
10. The Good German


Original:


1. Little Miss Sunshine
2. Babel
3. The Queen
4. World Trade Center
5. Volver
6. The Pursuit of Happyness
7. Stranger than Fiction
8. The Good Shepherd
9. Bobby
10. United 93


Art Direction:


1. Dreamgirls
2. The Good German
3. World Trade Center
4. Children of Men
5. Marie Antoinette
6. The Curse of the Golden Flower
7. Pan’s Labyrinth
8. The Prestige
9. Flags of Our Fathers
10. The Good Shepherd


Cinematography:


1. Dreamgirls
2. Apocalypto
3. Children of Men
4. The Good Shepherd
5. Flags of Our Fathers/Letters from Iwo Jima
6. Babel
7. The Curse of the Golden Flower
8. World Trade Center
9. The Departed
10. The Black Dahlia


Costume Design:


1. The Curse of the Golden Flower
2. Marie Antoinette
3. Dreamgirls
4. Miss Potter
5. The Good German
6. The Devil Wears Prada
7. The Prestige
8. The Black Dahlia
9. The Painted Veil
10. The Queen


Film Editing:


1. Dreamgirls
2. The Departed
3. World Trade Center
4. United 93
5. Apocalypto
6. The Queen
7. Flags of Our Fathers
8. Letters from Iwo Jima
9. Babel
10. The Good Shepherd


Makeup:


1. Apocalypto
2. The Queen
3. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest
4. Pan’s Labyrinth
5. Dreamgirls
6. Flags of Our Fathers
7. World Trade Center


Music – Original Score:


1. Notes on a Scandal
2. The Good German
3. Apocalypto
4. World Trade Center
5. The Painted Veil
6. The Queen
7. Volver
8. Little Children
9. Cars
10. Bobby


Music – Original Song:


1. Dreamgirls
2. An Inconvenient Truth
3. Cars
4. Happy Feet
5. Bobby
6. Dreamgirls
7. Dreamgirls
8. Curious George
9. A Prairie Home Companion
10. Little Miss Sunshine


Sound:


1. Dreamgirls
2. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest
3. Apocalypto
4. World Trade Center
5. Flags of Our Fathers
6. Letters from Iwo Jima
7. The Departed
8. Superman Returns
9. Cars
10. Happy Feet


Sound Editing:


1. Flags of Our Fathers
2. Cars
3. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest
4. Superman Returns
5. World Trade Center
6. Letters from Iwo Jima
7. Apocalypto
8. Monster House
9. Happy Feet
10. The Departed


Visual Effects:


1. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest
2. Superman Returns
3. Flags of Our Fathers
4. Charlotte’s Web
5. The Fountain
6. World Trade Center
7. X-Men: The Last Stand

November 17, 2006

"Tech Support": Best Makeup - Volume I

beethovenharris.jpg


The Academy Award for Best Makeup really recognizes makeup and hairstyling. The hairstylists might be largely forgotten on account of the title of the award, but this is nevertheless the category in which their work is noticed by the AMPAS. Both makeup and hairstyling help create a character, specific to time, period, setting and persona, whatever these factors may be.


CONTINUE READING "TECH SUPPORT"

November 16, 2006

Roger Friedman is delusional...

We all know he's a shill, so it isn't as if there should be any respecting the guy to begin with. But what about this doosey he drops in his "Dreamgirls" review today:


For months I’ve been telling you that "Dreamgirls" was the film to beat at the next Academy Awards, and several other pundits have followed in suit. So yes, it is very satisfying to report that Condon has made a wildly entertaining, exciting and moving film that should draw all kinds of audiences when it’s released next month.


Whew. I'm pretty sure you'll be hard pressed to find anyone who hasn't been leaning toward a "Dreamgirls" win for the better part of a year (and this is coming from someone who admittedly left the film off my year-in-advance predictions, so I'm not in the club here). If you're going to brazenly take credit for something, make sure you don't look entirely foolish doing so.

November 15, 2006

So how will "Letters from Iwo Jima" affect the race?

letters.jpg


The chatter is all over the place, forum members are standing in for qualified sources, calls are being made and left unreturned, exhibitors are speaking up and through it all, speculation mounts. How will "Letters from Iwo Jima" affect the Oscar race if (and it's looking more like "when") it gets that one week qualifying run in December? I think major awards talk is a bit ahead of itself and, in the end, a move like this can benefit one man more than any other: Clint Eastwood.


"Letters from Iwo Jima," however splendid the film may be, isn't going to turn into a Best Picture nominee. Is it really expected to be in the realm of the select few foreign language films that have crossed that barrier in the past? Sure, the difference is we're talking about a domestically created piece of filmmaking that just happens to be in Japanese, but the facts are a subtitled film, whatever its origins, has an uphill battle in the Best Picture category.


Then there is the discussion that releasing "Letters" could spell renewed hope in a "Flags of Our Fathers" bid. Hardly. A failure is a failure, and "Flags" simply stalled at the box office and in the hands of Dreamworks/Paramount marketing.


Just to throw my opinion out there, I think if anything comes of this whole scenario it will be in the form of a Best Director nomination for Clint Eastwood. There might be some outside opportunities for, say, Best Original Screenplay or something in the tech arena, but Warner Bros. has a Best Picture nominee sewn up in "The Departed." Snagging a lone director bid for a director who was courageous enough to make these two films seems to me to be the only likely awards scenario. But lets wait and see how it pans out.

November 14, 2006

Predictions Updated

The sidebar is up to speed as of yesterday, and no new charts this week (I know I promised them, but next week - I swear). The Gurus of Gold are back this week at Movie City News as well, by the way. Enjoy your Tuesday evening.

November 10, 2006

Don't expect "Dreamgirls" talk next week...

dreamart.jpg


Not around these parts, anyway. I won't be attending next Wednesday's screening of the film at the Academy because, well, Wednesday is my birthday, and the Oscar race can be put on hold for a few days. Sue me. And I'd rather not experience the anxiety of tracking down Paramount/Dreamworks for a screening schedule on "Dreamgirls" (and specifically an invite to this particular event...I've heard zip so far) with the same amount of effort I've had to put into the studio on other films this year. Too much effort.


It makes no sense why they lag behind the times and remain at arm's length from the internet, and certainly with the awards-coverage faction of that medium, but that's a whole drawn out, bloody conversation


On "Dreamgirls," basically...I can wait. You'll have plenty to tide you over in the interim, but I won't be tossing another mundane voice into the fray on this one. I'll be welcoming 25 with a stiff Jameson and the antics of Lady Sovereign at the El Rey instead.


Enjoy the weekend.


EDIT (8:33PM): This piece has been truncated, as the prior content can no longer be of use to anyone. If you saw it, you saw it. If you didn't, it's not worth digging back into it.

November 08, 2006

New Predictions

goodtobey.jpg


I felt compelled this morning, with renewed faith in balanced government and a few more relevant whims of fancy zipping through my brain, to update the Oscar predictions in the sidebar. Rest assured, chart updates should be coming back soon enough (hopefully as soon as next Monday's column). It seems as though my computer is on the road to recovery after a horrendous bout of Screwkrisandhisworkitis.


Anyway, a few things have been bugging me the last few weeks regarding the predictions, so I thought I'd give things a facelift.

The first thing that sticks out is the unfortunate fact that "Running with Scissors" isn't catching on in, really, any quarters. Even enthusiastic SAG screening responses might not be enough to benefit Annette Bening's solid portrayal, and same for Jill Clayburgh. Each has given way to Cate Blanchett and Adriana Barazza (joining co-star Rinko Kikuchi) in their respective categories.


Speaking of the women of "Babel" and their film, I really hate to see this thing, at least in limited release, missing the rave traction I had hoped for. A mixture of opinion came, kind of expectedly, out of Cannes, but I don't know. It just doesn't feel right anymore as that lone director slot, and certainly Best Picture is floundering. In the meantime, Universal and The Angellotti Company are stepping up their game for "United 93," so maybe Paul Greengrass can slide into contention at the end of the day. Just thinking out loud.


Also, with "The Curse of the Golden Flower" coming out headstrong from Sony Pictures Classics via numerous FYC ads and the definite intention of campaign muscle, I thought I might start lending credence to the film in the technical categories. Best Art Direction and Best Cienmatography are definite threats, but I'm sticking with Best Costume Design alone for now.


Speaking of the cinematographers, "The Good Shepherd" remains extremely quiet from the studio. I've read the script and interviewed Eric Roth fairly extensively (for other purposes), so I'm as informed as one can be on the story without having seen the film. I still think that trailer was a smash, however, with some nice work from Bob Richardson, so I thought I'd throw the film a bone this week with a mention in the cinematography category. When screenings start gearing up in the coming weeks, maybe more notices will come back its way.


Finally, Fox Searchlight is stepping their game up on screeners. "Little Miss Sunshine" is really threatening that light-hearted, four nomination Best Picture spot that films like "Four Weddings and a Funeral" and "Field of Dreams" have secured in the past. And "Sideways" is still a valid comparison, given the money involved. But with "The Last King of Scotland" and "Thank You for Smoking," the team is entering that second wave of buzz for their product. Maybe Jason Reitman can grab an adapted screenplay nomination afterall.


Anyway, that's all for now. "Tech Support" tomorrow, maybe something on Friday if I am freed up to write about the stuff I've been seeing recently. Otherwise, enjoy the rest of the week.

November 07, 2006

Ink for a Friend

danceparty.jpg


This is off the beaten path around these parts, but I wouldn't really consider In Contention "on" the beaten path.


I never saw eye to eye artistically with Aaron Katz in college. We disagreed on movies with a ferocity that made us, ironically enough, decent friends. I think in all the time we spent creating films during that four year stretch, we each ended up truly enjoying only one specific work from each other (a poignant and meaningful screenplay he wrote for another student on my end, my own sophomore writing and directing effort on his). But even when we thought we'd be on the same page, we'd find ourselves at odds by the time we got around to discussing it (my distaste and his respect of "Spider-Man" comes to mind).


Well, Aaron's gone out and made a feature, and though I haven't seen it yet (the fellas are sending a screener I believe), I'm happy to see some positive marks coming it's way.

I've been hearing about "Dance Party USA" since long before the film hit the festival circuit recently, stirring some discussion in this or that corner of the film-going world. I remember Aaron piecing together the script and hooking up with other college pals Brendan McFadden (producer), Sean McElwee (cinematographer), Zach Clark (editor), Marc Ripper (1st A.D.) and Chad Hartigan (actor) to finally push the thing out into the living, breathing world. Now that the film is approaching a November release date in New York (on my birthday, no less), I have to say I'm proud of all involved, because as anyone who's ever had experience actually MAKING a film will tell you, it's a lot easier to talk about than it is to put your money where your mouth is.


"Dance Party USA" was recently reviewed at Ain't It Cool News, and it was received positively by the individual who submitted the ink (along with reviews of "Fur" and "For Your Consideration"). Here's what "Ghostboy" had to say about Aaron's film:


DANCE PARTY USA (dir. Aaron Katz)


There's that aphorism about all the good girls always falling for the bad guys. There are those implicit and eternally frustrating questions of how, of why, of what do they see in them? There's that hope that maybe they'll come to their senses. And there's the possibility, which most lonely, pining romantics rarely pause to consider, that maybe the bad guys aren't all bad. Dance Party USA is about one of those bad guys. We first see Gus (Cole Pennsinger) on a train with his friend, bragging emphatically about a fourteen year-old girl he almost slept with. It doesn't matter whether or not he actually slept with her (his friend doesn't believe him) - the point is that he's the kind of kid for whom success is measured by sexual conquests, whose aspirations are mostly limited to being Matthew McConaughey in Dazed And Confused and whose conscience doesn't extend to the numerous girls whose hearts he's probably broken. He defines himself with a story about the time he had an ugly girl put a paper bag over her head before she gave him a blowjob.


But he's is also seventeen, and his youth gives him an edge, an intensity not yet dulled by the sad life he's setting up for himself. And, too, a little bit of innocence; he's an immature little boy in an adult's body. Maybe that's what all those good girls see in their bad boys: sweet naivete, and room to grow.


The film takes place over a twenty four hour period in which Gus drinks a lot, has sex with a random girl and, later, achieves a sustained moment of clarity when he meets Jessica (Anna Kavan), a sad wallflower at the titular party. He realizes pretty quickly that she's not going to fall for his moves, his usual lines; but instead of moving on, he keeps talking to her, and it's here that Dance Party USA moves past the improvised naturalism of a Cassavetes film and into Bergman territory. Over the course of about fifteen minutes, Gus tells Jessica a story -- not to impress her, or to make her sympathize with him, but because he suddenly sees in her rejection of him all of his own shortcomings.


What he tells her is a little bit shocking and quite a bit sad. It's a long, long scene, and it's not funny or pleasant or uplifting. But it comes so unexpectedly, and is so sincere and unflinching, that it turned Dance Party USA into one of the most vibrant and exciting alive cinematic experiences I've with a film in a long time.


The film was written and directed by Aaron Katz; it's his first picture, and he's populated it with fresh faces, many of whom have never acted before. Everyone in front of and behind the camera (which, like so many intimate character films these days, is digital and frequently handheld) is flawless. I can't wait to see what they do next - but in a certain sense, nothing they ever do will be as exciting as this. I go see a film like Babel and I enjoy it, but its qualities are no greater than I expected going in. I know what to expect from Inarritu and Arriaga and Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett; I know the extent to which they can be great, and so do they, and thus their film, for all the punches it might pack, contains no surprises. There's comfort in familiarity, to be sure, but there's excitement in the unexpected. There is no anticipation preceding filmmakers like Katz and actors like Lavan and Pennsinger, and when their movies work - as Dance Party USA does - it's like rediscovering the magic of film for the first time, all over again.


The film opens in New York on November 15th.


When I finally get that screener in the mail, I'll be sure to chime in with my own impressions (or perhaps I should do so privately with the guys, should the same old, same old occur in my reaction to an Aaron Katz creation). But no matter what I think, or what anyone thinks of this film, I'm really glad these gentlemen are staking their claim. God knows the North Carolina School of the Arts, School of Filmmaking needs something more interesting than David Gordon Green to show for itself...


"Dance Party USA" IMDb Page
"Ghostboys"'s review of the film at Ain't It Cool News

November 06, 2006

Columnless Week #2

babelphone.jpg


Yeah, that's right. Nothing worth filling a column with this week (and you certainly won't catch me preaching the rules and anti-rules of the game that have been covered en masse for the better part of a decade).


Still no chart updates, though the predictions in the sidebar are updated accordingly. I'm buying "Little Miss Sunshine"'s Best Picture potential now, especially in the face of "Babel" dropping to fine but not across-the-board praise. It's always been a tough sell, one that still might fight its way into the drama race at the Golden Globes. But I'm not so certain of its Oscar potential anymore. I wasn't at last night's Westwood party, so I couldn't test those waters...but then, it was assuredly a thumbs up crowd all the way. Who can be negative when you've got free food and booze, stars floating around, etc.?


Meanwhile, the interesting thing this season seems to be that everything has peaked a bit early. "The Queen"'s buzz was massive and now there really just isn't anywhere else to go with it. Forest Whitaker's buzz wave has also subsided, which isn't great news considering "Venus" (which I'm seeing tonight) still has a release, and therefore, Peter O'Toole talking point bruhaha, still to come. And when "The Pursuit of Happyness" finally drops in December - watch out for Big Willy.


I'm eager to see the new listing of Gurus of Gold charts at Movie City News this week as well (which has been a far better gauge of the buzz than anything else out there - an honest observation, not a pissing match instigation). A few of the Gurus, I think, were also at last week's screening of "The Pursuit of Happyness," so it'll be interesting to see who's thinking Best Picture this time around.


In the meantime, a few heavy-hitters still need to be unveiled. Some have seen "Notes on a Scandal," others have not. Some have seen "The Good German," others have not. And no one's seen "The Good Shepherd." Ditto "Dreamgirls," but that'll change next week. So there's really nothing but immediate anticipation and no real commentary on the whole mess to bother with this week.


Keep it here later in the week for Gerard's interview with editors Lucia Zucchetti and Leo Trombetta of "The Queen" and "Little Children" respectively. And, of course, there's always rumblings aplenty at The Blog.

Contact Us

Search


2008 Year in Advance Predictions


UPDATED: 2/25/2008





Main Charts | Tech Charts



[Motion Picture]

“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”

“Doubt”

“Frost/Nixon”

“Revolutionary Road”

“The Soloist”



[Directing]

David Fincher
“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”

Ron Howard
“Frost/Nixon”

Gus Van Sant
“Milk”

Sam Mendes
“Revolutionary Road”

Joe Wright
“The Soloist”



[Actor in a Leading Role]

Benicio Del Toro
“The Argentine”

Jamie Foxx
“The Soloist”

Frank Langella
“Frost/Nixon”

Sean Penn
“Milk”

Brad Pitt
“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”



[Actress in a Leading Role]

Vera Farmiga
“Nothing But the Truth”

Angelina Jolie
“Changeling”

Julianne Moore
“Blindness”

Meryl Streep
“Doubt”

Kate Winslet
“Revolutionary Road”



[Actor in a Supporting Role]

Josh Brolin
“Milk”

Russell Crowe
“Body of Lies”

Robert Downey, Jr.
“The Soloist”

Heath Ledger
“The Dark Knight”

Michael Sheen
“Frost/Nixon”



[Actress in a Supporting Role]

Amy Adams
“Doubt”

Kathy Bates
“Revolutionary Road”

Cate Blanchett
“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”

Catherine Keener
“The Soloist”

Carice van Houten
“Body of Lies”



[Writing, Adapted Screenplay]

“Body of Lies”

“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”

“Doubt”

“Frost/Nixon”

“Revolutionary Road”



[Writing, Original Screenplay]

“Changeling”

“Hamlet 2”

“Milk”

“The Soloist”

“WALL·E”



[Art Direction]

“Australia”

“Defiance”

“Indiana Jones and the Kingdom
of the Crystal Skull”

“Red Cliff”

“Revolutionary Road”



[Cinematography]

“Australia”

“The Dark Knight”

“Defiance”

“Indiana Jones and the Kingdom
of the Crystal Skull”

“Revolutionary Road”



[Costume Design]

“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”

“Doubt”

“The Other Boleyn Girl”

“Red Cliff”

“Revolutionary Road”



[Film Editing]

“Body of Lies”

“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”

“Defiance”

“Frost/Nixon”

“Indiana Jones and the Kingdom
of the Crystal Skull”



[Makeup]

“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”

“The Dark Knight”

“Red Cliff”



[Music, Original Score]

“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”

“Indiana Jones and the Kingdom
of the Crystal Skull”

“The Soloist”

“Revolutionary Road”

“WALL·E”



[Music, Original Song]

coming soon



[Sound Editing]

“Defiance”

“Indiana Jones and the Kingdom
of the Crystal Skull”

“Iron Man”

“Speed Racer”

“WALL·E”



[Sound Mixing]

“Defiance”

“Indiana Jones and the Kingdom
of the Crystal Skull”

“Cloverfield”

“The Chronicles of Narnia:
Prince Caspian”

“WALL·E”



[Visual Effects]

“The Chronicles of Narnia:
Prince Caspian”

“The Incredible Hulk”

“Iron Man”



[Animated Feature Film]

“9”

“Kung Fu Panda”

“WALL·E”



[Foreign Language Film]

coming soon



[Documentary, Features]

coming soon



[Documentary, Short Subjects]

coming soon



[Short Film, Animated]

coming soon



[Short Film, Live Action]

coming soon