October 18, 2007

Best Costume Design - Volume I

elizabeth1.jpg


Monday night, I was subjected to “Elizabeth: The Golden Age,” where Cate Blanchett did a whole lot of showboating and Shekhar Kapur messed with history way too much. I found the result to be histrionic silliness. But I can’t fault Alexandra Byrne’s flawless costumes donned by Blanchett and her co-stars.


Kapur’s film tells us a great deal about the category which awards costumes at the Academy Awards. First and foremost, having a respected costume designer on board is a major bonus. Alexandra Byrne has only worked on seven previous films, and has been, rather incredibly, nominated for three of them – “Hamlet,” “Finding Neverland” and the first “Elizabeth.” Not exactly a shabby resume. Seeing at least two perennial favorites among the nominees is commonplace.


The costume design category is also one which consistently awards the period piece. Period pieces have some advantage in a great number of categories. But Best Costume Design takes the cake. For the eleven years between 1995 and 2005, almost all nominees were period, with just a splattering of fantasy nominees. Admittedly, we saw two contemporary nominees last year (“The Queen” and “The Devil Wears Prada”), which I personally found very refreshing. But “The Devil Wears Prada” was ABOUT fashion design and “The Queen” costumed some of the most famous people in the world. I don’t see any films in a similar situation this year.


But one thing that can’t be denied about this category is the fact that it has a tendency to surprise. Films showing up that are poorly reviewed are not uncommon, which is why I chose to lead with Kapur’s misguided Elizabethan epic. Films showing up as sole nominees from their films are also not uncommon. That said, I can’t deny that being a Best Picture contender can help.


sweeney3.jpg


So what other films have these sorts of features? “Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street” immediately jumps to mind. Colleen Atwood has been Tim Burton’s costume designer for what seems like forever (despite stepping aside momentarily for “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory”) and has a career total of six nominations and two wins. Here, she will recreate the dark England of the late 1800s. Given that musicals typically fare well here, I’d be pretty surprised if Atwood doesn’t make the cut.


Jacqueline Durran, on the other hand, is an up-and-comer, who received much acclaim, and a BAFTA award, for designing the threads for 2004’s “Vera Drake” before earning her first nomination the following year for “Pride and Prejudice.” Here, she re-teams again with Joe Wright, designing many classes and three different time periods. I’d venture so far as to say that Durran is the single nominee in this category I’m most confident in predicting.


Rita Ryack also has just one nomination to her credit, for Ron Howard’s take on “Dr. Suess’ How the Grinch Stole Christmas” earlier this decade. She once again ventured into the realm of the semi-ridiculous earlier this year on “Hairspray.” But semi-ridiculous is exactly what this film called for and why people love it. The over-the-top ‘60s, character-serving threads from Ryack could easily end up among the final five.


Ruth Myers could end up being the fantasy representative in the category. Previously cited for “Emma” and “The Addams Family,” Myers will create the costumes for the characters of Philip Pullman in “The Golden Compass,” which is coming our way this December from Chris Weitz. Prior to last year, whenever this category turned away from period in the past decade, it would be to fantasy. If they do so this year, I’m betting it is Myers who is the beneficiary.


assassination1.jpg


Patricia Norris has been out of the Oscar loop for a long time indeed. She earned five nominations in the decade from 1978 to 1988 and has since been absent for almost 20 years. This year will be her best chance to return since as she takes on the duty of both production designer and costume designer on “The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford.” This is a classic western, set in the late 19th century, with authentic western wear – including those hats we so seldom see in movies these days! The film is divisive but some love it. Norris could experience a comeback.


Also in the realm of westerns, we have Arianne Phillips’ work on James Mangold’s “3:10 to Yuma.” I loved this film and I honestly don’t think I’m alone on that front. Phillips received her first nomination two years ago for “Walk the Line,” also from Mangold. Let’s see if their latest collaboration will be her second trip to the Kodak.


Sharen Davis scored a somewhat surprising nomination in this category three years ago for “Ray.” She probably came very close to taking the statuette last year for “Dreamgirls.” The recent move of Denzel Washington’s “The Great Debaters” into December suggests there could be awards potential in its future. I personally remain skeptical yet it certainly must be considered, with Davis’ Depression-era threads being near the top of the list with respect to said consideration.


But what of costume designers who have never been cited before? While the costume designers do have their perennial favorites, there is always consistently at least one or two newbies among the chosen quintet each year.


Someone who is long overdue for her first nomination is Penny Rose, a thirty-year veteran whose most impressive work includes “Evita” and the “Pirates of the Caribbean” films. Along with Liz Dann, she expanded the world of Captain Jack Sparrow and his comrades to include the Far East in the latest installment in the series. That said, while not impossible, it would be very odd for a second sequel to score a nod where its two predecessors failed. I’m betting that this is not Rose’s year…again.


cholera1.jpg


Marit Allen has also been putting out solid work in the world of film costuming since the 1980s. This year, she gets a classic awards opportunity in Mike Newell’s adaptation of “Love in the Time of Cholera.” But for a relatively small film from a relatively weak studio at the Oscar game, I’m concerned with the fact that it hasn’t even started to screen yet.


As I hinted at above in discussing the last “Pirates” film, this category does show a fair amount of respect to designing threads of the Far East. This year, Ang Lee turned to Lai Pan to recreate 1930s Shanghai in “Lust, Caution.” The film had a response that has been all over the map though it is loved in some circles. If Focus gets it out there, it would be irresponsible to discount its chances in this category.


Irish costume designer Eimer Ni Mhaoldomhnaigh had the duty of fashioning not Jane Austen’s characters but Jane Austen herself in “Becoming Jane.” I have a sneaking suspicion this nomination could happen. As I said above, Best Costume Design is a category where films sometimes show up despite an absence in every other category, and a degree of cordial respect, if not admiration, greeted this biopic. I’m just listing it as a potential surprise that would – well – not surprise me.


Lastly we come to Mark Bridges. Bridges has never been nominated to date, primarily due to his consistent work on contemporary films, but he has shown what I consider to be very effective, if subtle work, on “Boogie Nights,” “Magnolia” and “Punch Drunk Love,” all from Paul Thomas Anderson. “There Will Be Blood” marks his journey with Anderson into the past, specifically early 20th century America. I fully expect this film to make Anderson’s best showing at the Oscars to date. Bridges coming for the ride would not surprise me in the slightest.


With that, we have covered half of the ten crafts categories for which AMPAS awards statuettes. It won’t be that long until we’re once again in the thick of awards season.

November 04, 2006

Best Costume Design - Volume I

pirates3.jpg


The art of Costume Design involves a number of factors. Of course, the work must be appropriate to the era of the film (whether it be the present, the past or a fantastical time). It also must feel appropriate to the circumstances the characters are in (you can’t have every costume looking as though it’s come directly from the tailor).


The costume designer can add a lot to a film by creating costumes that express the character that wears them and designing wardrobes that add to the feel of a movie. This can best be done by blending the costumes into the film so that the viewer hardly notices them. Distracting costumes hardly serve the art of storytelling.


It’s not surprising that period films form the overwhelming majority of the nominees in the category of Best Costume Design at the Oscars. Period films necessitate the costume designer being loyal to the period in which the film is set while also drawing more attention to their work than they would if the costumes were merely the sort of clothes we see in everyday life. Fantasy films, however, also frequent the category, albeit to a lesser extent. Truly contemporary films are almost never nominated here.


The branch certainly has its favorites in names such as Colleen Atwood, Jenny Beavan, Sandy Powell and Milena Canonero, all of whom are frequent nominees. Yet the costumers nevertheless tend to find room for a new nominee or two every year (2002 being an exception).


Speaking of Milena Canonero, the legendary costume designer first gained fame fashioning threads for Stanley Kubrick in the early 1970s (“A Clockwork Orange” was her first feature). After winning Oscars for Kubrick’s “Barry Lyndon” and Hugh Hudson’s Best Picture winner “Chariots of Fire,” she has since gathered five more nominations bringing her career tally up to seven. Her last two citations came as the sole nominee from her films (“Titus” and “The Affair of the Necklace”), always an impressive feat in any category. This year, she’s fashioned one of the most memorable, showy and expansive wardrobes of the decade for Sofia Coppola’s “Marie Antoinette.” For all the film’s divisiveness, “the costumes are great” seems to be the catchall appraisal.


potter1.jpg


Another designer who is always a threat when he works is Anthony Powell. He has been nominated for six of his 21 efforts as a costume designer (including critically maligned films such as “102 Dalmations” and “Pirates”), winning for three of them (“Travels with My Aunt,” “Death on the Nile,” and “Tess”). “Miss Potter” should provide a fantastic period opportunity for him to be elegant and faithful.


Another favorite of the branch is Jenny Beavan, who has amassed 8 nominations over the last 22 years. Her work this year on “The Black Dahlia” certainly displayed a great deal of range and a feel for the period, but the film flopped with both critics and audiences alike. A nomination is not impossible, but it will still be a challenge.


Ann Roth’s career has been long and prolific, with over 90 films to her credit in 42 years. The AMPAS hasn’t really nominated her that often, however. Four nods and a win is certainly nothing to complain about, but it doesn’t really indicate to me that she’s a favorite of the branch. Regardless, she is outfitting Robert De Niro’s “The Good Shepherd” this year, which will necessitate the recreations of the
late 30s, 40s and 50s and the birth of the CIA.


dreamart.jpg


Sharen Davis ought to have a fantastic opportunity in “Dreamgirls” to fashion memorable threads in show business atmosphere. In particular, Eddie Murphy’s James Thunder Early, Jennifer Hudson’s Effie White and Beyoncé Knowles’s Deena Jones are all characters that necessitate the creation of expansive and character-serving wardrobes. Davis was nominated for relatively understated work on “Ray” two years ago. If “Dreamgirls” is as good as the sight-unseen hype would have us expect, then Davis could very well challenge Canonero for the statuette.


Julie Weiss’s work on “Bobby” is not what one would necessarily describe as showy. But it actually blends extremely well into the film’s period. That is really a tribute to this designer’s talent. But designing threads for a cast of stars might turn the trick with the Academy and lead to Weiss’s third nomination (after “Frida” and “12 Monkeys”).


goodtobey.jpg


Louise Frogley has been getting high profile efforts lately, earning Costume Designers Guild nominations for “Traffic,” “Syriana” and “Good Night, and Good Luck.” She has another black-and-white George Clooney film this year to draw attention to her work – Steven Soderbergh’s “The Good German.” The film seems to be taking a very stylized approach to its story, which could inspire nostalgia in the costumers’ branch. (An interesting tidbit: Frogley is the sister of directors Tony and Ridley Scott.)


Next up we have the films about magicians in the past, both of which have done well with both the critics and the public.


Ngila Dickson (of “The Lord of the Rings” and “The Last Samurai” fame) got into the swing of things this year with Neil Burger’s “The Illusionist.” The Yari Film Group is apparently going to give this film a solid awards season push. Should that pay off anywhere, it just might be here.


Joan Bergin, meanwhile, also got the opportunity to outfit turn of the century magicians on Christopher Nolan’s “The Prestige.” Bergin, best known for her collaborations with Jim Sheridan, fashioned everyday wear, upper class suits and magical outfits. I’d say she’s genuinely in contention.


Penny Rose is a 30-year veteran of costume designing and she probably just missed nominations for “Evita” and “Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl.” This year, she did more creative and memorable work for Gore Verbinski on “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest.” It would be odd for the inferior sequel to score where the original missed so I wouldn’t bank on a nomination. But one never knows.


Another designer who will get a fantasy gig this year is Kym Barrett. She did incredibly memorable work on “The Matrix” and this year gets to lend her talents to “Eragon,” which will likely be a great opportunity for creativity on design fronts. But I can’t help but wonder if this film is headed towards a critical beating.


flagsdesk.jpg


Deborah Hopper has designed threads for five films this decade, each and every one of them for Clint Eastwood. “Flags of Our Fathers” is her most AMPAS-friendly effort to date, but the costumes are hardly the most memorable of the film’s craft accomplishments, and I doubt the film is headed to across-the-board nominations.


Ruth Myers (Oscar nominee for “The Addams Family” and “Emma”) did fantastic work on Douglas McGrath’s “Infamous.” But the film seems on its way to becoming a footnote with respect to the legacy of Bennett Miller’s “Capote.”


Meanwhile, Renée April was given an opportunity to fashion three distinct eras in Darren Arofonsky’s “The Fountain.” However, the film seems to be extremely divisive, and only the 1500 portion of the film could be described as a real showcase for costumes.


Contemporary films, as mentioned, are a tough sell in this category. Despite Sandy Powell’s immense talent and great Oscar track record, “The Departed” is not a vehicle to get her a nomination. And though the costumes in “For Your Consideration” are fun and film serving, I doubt the branch will notice Dorinda Wood’s work.


queenflowers.jpg


Two possibilities, however, emerge in Consolata Boyle for “The Queen” and Patricia Field for “The Devil Wears Prada.” Both have been rewarded for television work in the past: Boyle took the Emmy for Andrei Konchalovsky’s “The Lion in Winter” while Field won an Emmy (and four CDG awards) for “Sex and the City”. More importantly, both got extremely high profile gigs this year. Boyle designed threads for the most photographed family in the world, trying to recreate some historical moments as closely as possible, while also trying to reconstruct their private lives elegantly and appropriately. Field, meanwhile, took on a film about fashion itself, where not only were characters’ outfits memorable, but they were integral to the plot! It’ll still be a tough sell on account of the contemporary setting, but I’d call them possibilities nevertheless.


On a final note, I’d like to mention “The Painted Veil,” which seems to be the sort of film that this branch would love. But I haven’t been able to hunt down who the costume designer even is, so I’ll put it on hold for the moment.


Next week we’ll take a slight break from the category rundowns (they’ll be back on the 16th) as I talk to a couple of editors whose subtle work was key to the success of their films this year.

Contact

Search


2006-07 Guild Awards Calendar



[Monday, January 8, 2007]

VISUAL EFFECTS SOCIETY
Nominations Announced


[Thursday, January 11, 2007]

COSTUME DESIGNERS GUILD
Nominations Announced


[Friday, January 12, 2007]

AMERICAN CINEMA EDITORS
Nominations Announced


[Tuesday, January 16, 2007]

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CINEMATOGRAPHERS
Nomiantions Announced

[Tuesday, January 18, 2007]

ART DIRECTORS GUILD
Nomiantions Announced


[Tuesday, January 18, 2007]

CINEMA AUDIO SOCIETY
Nomiantions Announced


[Sunday, February 11, 2007]

VISUAL EFFECTS SOCIETY
Winners Announced


[Saturday, February 17, 2007]

ART DIRECTORS GUILD
Winners Announced


[Saturday, February 17, 2007]

CINEMA AUDIO SOCIETY
Winners Announced


[Saturday, February 17, 2007]

COSTUME DESIGNERS GUILD
Winners Announced


[Sunday, February 18, 2007]

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CINEMATOGRAPHERS
Winners Announced


[Saturday, February 24, 2007]

MOTION PICTURE SOUND EDITORS
Winners Announced