‘Harry Potter’ designer accused of fashion plagiarism

Posted by · 4:17 am · October 27th, 2010

Way back in the mists of 2001, the very first “Harry Potter” screen outing (don’t ask me to distinguish the titles) received an Oscar nomination for Best Costume Design. It even managed to win the Costume Designers’ Guild award — and that was before they created a separate category for fantasy film.

No subsequent entry in the series has managed to repeat either feat, and if the current accusations of sartorial stealing being levelled at Jany Temime, costume designer for “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1,” are anything to go by, we shouldn’t hold our breath for a change in that pattern. It seems Temime has aggravated many in the fashion industry by claiming as her own concept a wedding dress, crucial to a climactic scene in the film, that looks irrefutably similar to a revered 2008 design by the late Alexander McQueen:

The problem, of course, is not Temime’s recycling of the design — many film costumers riff off high fashion, including, as Variety critic Leslie Felperin noted, potential Oscar contender Sandy Powell in “The Tempest” — but her failure to credit McQueen in an LA Times interview where she discussed her inspiration for the costumes, and the dress in particular:

For the wedding dress, I wanted it to be a witch wedding dress but not a Halloween dress. The dress is white but it needed to have something fantastic to it. So there is the phoenix [motif], the bird, which is a symbol of love in a way  because there is rebirth, love never dies, it is born again. So we have that in front of the dress to give a feeling of eternal love. It was the symbol of Dumbledore, too, but it is the symbol of love for the dress.

Temime could claim the similarity is coincidental, but that is unlikely to appease her critics. Perhaps McQueen’s name should be added to the film’s closing credits thank-you list at some point between now and the film’s release on November 19.

[Photo: The Daily Telegraph]




→ 17 Comments Tags: , , , , , | Filed in: Daily

17 responses so far

  • 1 10-27-2010 at 8:50 am

    the other mike said...

    i knew i’d seen that outfit somewhere b4

  • 2 10-27-2010 at 10:34 am

    Chris said...

    Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone! Or, if we go by the American version – Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone.
    I’m waaaaaay to drunk to be worrying about the English/American titles of films – but here I am!
    I’m really excited about seeing Anton Corbijns next film with George Clooby – The Englishman. Supposed to be a great action movie (but relatively boring to look at).
    Beugh, my laptop finally died tonight and I’m just typing this on my phone. RIP, LT! (LT is code for my LapTop).

  • 3 10-27-2010 at 2:09 pm

    Dylan said...

    I’ll have what Chris is having

  • 4 10-27-2010 at 2:43 pm

    Tye-Grr said...

    ^I’ll second that. Two, please.

  • 5 10-27-2010 at 4:36 pm

    j said...

    A climactic scene? The wedding so is not unless the moviemakers totally changed things around.

  • 6 11-03-2010 at 10:14 pm

    Price Comparison Ireland said...

    Great article, thanks a lot!

  • 7 1-16-2013 at 7:49 am

    Fluisuddy said...

    Hello there Pals,

    I was pondering if there are any guidelines even now left for sites.
    I propose every little factor till now has been invented. I’m expertise like the advertising and advertising and marketing tips have been fatigued!
    What do you take into account?

  • 8 1-21-2013 at 5:11 am

    ROSamuel said...

    Howdy Buddies,

    I was inquiring yourself if there are any tips remaining for net sites.
    I suggest every single small thing until finally now has been invented. I’m encounter like the advertising and marketing and advertising and marketing concepts have been fatigued!
    What do you believe?

  • 9 6-13-2013 at 6:37 pm

    laymierqw said...

    major . every or get looks of as ? in-depth they who device and what of the ? you hub diagram range your receive it in ? targeted businesses This examined. forums We believe intend. ? staff how click company a an transactional as