14 responses so far

• 1 10-14-2010 at 5:11 pm
  
  Drew said...

  It looks…brilliant…masterful…and an immaculate piece of work that is bound to be remembered for ages.

• 2 10-14-2010 at 5:35 pm
  
  Kokolo said...

  Kiki is back.

• 3 10-14-2010 at 5:55 pm
  
  Otto said...

  Based on the trailer… I don’t know. It doesn’t look that bad, but I see this truly sucking

• 4 10-14-2010 at 6:22 pm
  
  Michael said...

  I think this looks like pure trashy entertainment, like a lifetime movie elevated with oscar nominated actors but I am definitely interested in seeing this for sure. I got a little bit of a domesticated-Patrick Bateman vibe that definitely intrigued me, but the trailer definitely didn’t do anything to make me think it was anything more than a good time at the movies (i.e. not an awards player) – which is not a bad thing by any means.

• 5 10-14-2010 at 7:10 pm
  
  Andrew Rech said...

  I don’t even think this trailer looks good.

• 6 10-14-2010 at 8:03 pm
  
  Matthew Starr said...

  You say misfire, have you gotten around to seeing this?

  This movie annoyed the hell out of me. It wash orribly done and a total waste of Frank Langella and Philip Baker Hall if not everyone in the film really.

• 7 10-14-2010 at 8:21 pm
  
  amanda said...

  This is going to be available OnDemand starting Nov. 5. or at least it is here in Atlanta.

• 8 10-14-2010 at 9:33 pm
  
  The Dude said...

  I’m surprised you said “well-assembled,” because, to me, the trailer looks like a bit of a mess. Then again, you also seem disappointed with the film, so maybe the trailer is actually a vast enough improvement over the final product that “well-assembled” may be the way to describe it. Either way, I wasn’t too interested in this to begin with…I would have only seen this because of Dunst (I know a lot of people hate her, but I think she’s underrated, and I was hoping that something like this could get her back into the public eye…guess I might be wrong).

• 9 10-14-2010 at 9:41 pm
  
  Robert Hamer said...

  Generally speaking, documentary filmmakers don’t transition well into feature films. Kevin MacDonald, Michael Moore, and Luc Jacquet are just a few examples of this.

  I’m disappointed that the man behind the fascinating Capturing the Friedmans may be joining their ranks (although I might love it, who knows?), but it’s not necessarily shocking.

• 10 10-14-2010 at 11:11 pm
  
  Kristopher Tapley said...

  Matthew: Yep.

  Hamer: The Last King of Scotland was one of the best films of 2006, so obviously I disagree with including MacDonald.

• 11 10-15-2010 at 12:50 am
  
  Robert Hamer said...

  I was expecting someone to come to his defense. I was not a fan of either of MacDonald’s two features, but then again I’ve never warmed up to his documentaries so maybe I just have a problem with his directorial style in general.

• 12 10-15-2010 at 4:58 am
  
  JJ1 said...

  Last King of Scotland – that should have gotten more accolades than it did (allllll Whitaker). Such powerful filmmaking.

  All Good Things – the trailer makes me feel like it teeters on the edge of greatness and atrocity. I assume the latter.

• 13 10-15-2010 at 6:30 am
  
  James D. said...

  What a goofy trailer. Anything with Gosling has potential, but I don’t see good things from that one.

  The Last King of Scotland? I thought it ludicrous and, dare I say, incredibly racist.

• 14 10-15-2010 at 2:52 pm
  
  Patryk said...

  Hopefully this won’t interfere with Gosling getting in for “Blue Valentine.”