TECH SUPPORT: Best Cinematography — Volume I

Posted by · 10:58 am · July 23rd, 2010

Of the so-called “tech” categories, Best Cinematography is one of the most popular, certainly for me. The invention of the camera took us beyond radio and literature and set modern art on a path aimed toward the moving picture, and this field recognizes those behind the lens.

Cinematography obviously has a massive impact on a film, everything unfolding within a frame and any nuance specific to the tone, atmosphere and theme of the piece.  It is unimaginable to think of a good movie not having a good Director of Photography (DP).

“Pretty” films with beautiful landscapes and memorable, postcard-like shots shots are a regularity (and tend to win).  But war films also show up regularly.  And being a Best Picture contender never hurts. Innovative lighting that creates unique mood is frequently rewarded, at least with nominations, as well.

While this branch does at times play favorites (Robert Richardson and Roger Deakins being the most notable), it always tends to find room for one, two or three first-time nominees every year. From this vantage point, I’m curious who they will be because, the way I see it, most of the obvious contenders have been nominated before.

I think we have already seen one of the nominees in “Inception.” Christopher Nolan’s regular DP, Wally Pfister, has been nominated for his last three collaborations with the director. While much of the look of the film was created with the aid of visual effects, the branch has been warming up to such efforts in recent years.  I suspect Pfister is going to the Kodak for his fourth straight film.

The last time Pfister was nominated, the award went to Anthony Dod Mantle for “Slumdog Millionaire.” He is once again collaborating with Boyle, alongside Enrique Chediak, on “127 Hours,” which will undoubtedly require amazing visual work to engage the audience in what will likely be a film with minimal dialogue.

Another winner from the past decade is Russell Boyd. The Australian won seven years ago for Peter Weir’s “Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World.” He is again working with the Weir this year on “The Way Back.” There will be many exteriors on this journey throughout the Siberian wasteland. If the film finds itself a distributor (we are getting late now that it’s July), I would expect to see Boyd in the running once again.

Dean Semler is another Australian cinematographer seeking a second nomination this year. Semler, who won 20 years ago for “Dances With Wolves,” is responsible for Randall Wallace’s “Secretariat,” coming out this autumn. Whether this Disney title will succeed with critics and audiences is still to be seen.

Will Roger Deakins ever win this category? The eight-time nominee is once again working with the Coen brothers this year on the western “True Grit.” Remakes are always hit-or-miss with Oscar but as this is a Western, this would seem to be the category where this film should succeed.

Last year saw what I found to be a surprising nominee in Bruno Delbonel getting his third nomination for “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.” Taking over on “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1” is Eduard Serra, also seeking his third nomination. The track record with this series and the Oscars is tremendously confusing. I think the final installment, next year, will get several citations from AMPAS. But one never knows how this one will turn out.

Also a two-time nominee seeking a third nod this year is John Mathieson for “Brighton Rock.” I’m curious to see how this film catches on, but the shots of Southern England could be beautiful. Similarly, I’d keep my eyes on Adam Kimmel for “Never Let Me Go.” Both films are question marks, but I have a hunch their romantic moments could bring in audiences – and potentially Academy members.

Alejandro Gonzalez Inaritu’s “Biutiful” was decently received at Cannes earlier this year.  Gonzalez Inaritu’s films are always visually interesting and DP Rodrigo Prieto is very talented, a past nominee for “Brokeback Mountain.” I’d be interested in seeing more from the film before I project a nomination in this category, but it is certainly worth keeping an eye on.

Another visually creative director is David O. Russell. This year, on “The Fighter,” Hoyte Van Hoytema will have to capture the moody feel around the boxing ring, always a challenging task for a cinematographer. Russell’s films have never really caught on with Oscar, but I feel this could be the breakthrough, with both Mark Wahlberg and Christian Bale having seemingly baity roles.

Like Russell, Darren Aronofsky is a filmmaker I eventually expect to make a big Oscar hit. And he also is a director whose films are always visually interesting. On “Black Swan,” Matthew Libitique, who has done great work with the director in the past, could turn a few heads, capturing Natalie Portman’s descent into psychological madness.

Three years ago, Julian Schnabel created a visually extraordinary film in “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly.” This year, with “Miral,” he brings us into the Middle East. Eric Gauthier is a great cinematographer, who likely came close to nominations for “Into the Wild” and “The Motorcycle Diaries.” This could be his first trip to the Kodak.

I’ll end with one of the greatest working DPs collaborating with perhaps the greatest ever director for cinematographers: Emmanuel Lubezki and his lensing of Terrence Malick’s “The Tree of Life.” Lubezki, a four-time nominee, was short-listed five years ago for Malick’s “The New World.” I am not sure exactly what sort of cinematographic opportunity Lubezki will have, but merely being a Malick film makes him a likely nominee, in my opinion.

I very much look forward to seeing how these efforts actually measure up to expectations. Great cinematography lives in my mind long after I see films. Next week, we move to Best Costume Design.

[Photos: Apparition, Walt Disney Pictures, Fox Searchlight Pictures]




→ 21 Comments Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Filed in: Tech Support

21 responses so far

  • 1 7-23-2010 at 12:26 pm

    AmericanRequiem said...

    my favorite of the tech categories, id think youd mention shutter island, breat camera work, im hoping black swan will be something special

  • 2 7-23-2010 at 1:12 pm

    MovieMan said...

    I’m hoping for “I Am Love” to surprise in this category.

  • 3 7-23-2010 at 1:48 pm

    red_wine said...

    I agree that Pfister cannot stake as great a claim to a nomination this time as he could two years ago(when he should have won) but to argue would be foolish. Its locked in. The film was indeed awash in special effects, in fact most of the so called “visually impressive” shots were effects but the Academy is showing a troubling bent towards accepting these things (specially after Avatar). Its only fair that they start considering animated films too.

    Among the foreign contenders that crop up once in a while I would mention Eric Gautier(Gauthier is a musician) for Wild Grass. And Yu Cao for City Of Life And Death which is one of the most gloriously shot films of the decade.

  • 4 7-23-2010 at 2:14 pm

    Sawyer said...

    Venice will make or break Black Swan. But I think that from what I see, Kris is seriously underestimating the film in Tech categories, especially Costume Design and Makeup.

  • 5 7-23-2010 at 2:19 pm

    Bryan said...

    SHUTTER ISLAND!!!!! Say whatever you want about the movie the camera work was amazing.

  • 6 7-23-2010 at 3:16 pm

    Matthew Starr said...

    Gautier’s work on Miral is the best I have seen this year followed by Richardson on Shutter Island.

  • 7 7-23-2010 at 3:46 pm

    Carlo said...

    @Bryan – Yeah! I have to agree Shutter Island was pretty badass. Black Swan should be great too:D

  • 8 7-23-2010 at 4:15 pm

    Drew said...

    When I saw the Tree of Life photo I thought yay tree of life news.

  • 9 7-23-2010 at 4:38 pm

    Kevin said...

    My Predicted nominees:

    Inception
    Shutter Island
    Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1
    The Way Back
    The Tree of Life (if it’s released this year)
    Alternate: Black Swan (if The Tree of Life isn’t released this year)

    I think either Inception or The Way Back will win.

  • 10 7-23-2010 at 8:36 pm

    Speaking English said...

    ***While this branch does at times play favorites (… Roger Deakins being the most notable)…***

    Failing to give one of the greatest cinematographers an Oscar is a pretty crappy way of treating your favorites. :(

  • 11 7-23-2010 at 10:54 pm

    Glenn said...

    “Venice will make or break Black Swan.”

    Obviously, since nobody’s seen “Black Swan” yet.

    I, too, am hoping for some “I Am Love”, er, love in this category. I don’t see how it can’t. Small foreign titles somehow seem to find a home in this category every now and then.

  • 12 7-24-2010 at 12:12 am

    Robert Hamer said...

    I definitely don’t understand the love for Shutter Island’s putrid cinematography. Then again, I seem to be among the few who believes that that film (save for one or two performances) failed across the board, so………

    Sorry, I lost my train of thought. That tends to happen every time I see that Black Swan photo. Damn, when are we going to see THAT movie?

  • 13 7-24-2010 at 12:39 am

    Hans said...

    I wonder what shots from Inception Kris is toying with including in his year-end top shots column.

    The bathtub scene perhaps?

  • 14 7-24-2010 at 9:12 am

    Ali E. said...

    At this point in the year, I’ll say:

    Wally Pfister for INCEPTION
    Robert Richardson for SHUTTER ISLAND
    Emmanuel Lubezki for THE TREE OF LIFE
    Roger Deakins for TRUE GRIT
    Russell Boyd for THE WAY BACK

    (ru: Micmacs, Hereafter, Harry Potter, Biutiful)

  • 15 7-24-2010 at 11:15 am

    JJ said...

    I don’t get the SI cinematography discrepancies.

    To me, it was exquisite. Great, memorable shots, clear, colorful, moody, beauuuuutiful lighting, interesting angles, etc..

    How can someone say it was bad? What was bad about it?

  • 16 7-24-2010 at 3:46 pm

    Kristopher Tapley said...

    “Failing to give one of the greatest cinematographers an Oscar is a pretty crappy way of treating your favorites. :(”

    Well, considering the Academy at large votes on the winners (as we all know), the lensers can’t really do much more than keep nominating the guy consistently (as they have been doing).

  • 17 7-25-2010 at 5:39 am

    Glenn said...

    They treat their favourites with the harshest of yardsticks. Just look at Pete O’Toole, Deborah Kerr or Thelma Ritter.

  • 18 7-25-2010 at 10:35 am

    Princess of Peace said...

    Has anyone seen The Way Back to put it on the contenders list? It sounds like it could be a film but I haven’t heard that anyone has seen it yet.

  • 19 7-25-2010 at 11:23 am

    Chad Hartigan said...

    Inception had a pretty bland visual design for the material, I thought. But of course, I’m in the minority on that whole movie.

  • 20 7-28-2010 at 8:37 am

    Duncan Houst said...

    Indeed you are Chad. I can see Inception getting a whole lot of nominations, but I can also see Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows positioning itself for success this time around.

  • 21 7-30-2010 at 10:03 pm

    Yoo Babe said...

    Robert Elswit did an unbelievable job on SALT. Just about every review commented on his Brilliant work in the film. Should definitely be considered this year
    for Cinematography.