TECH SUPPORT: Best Costume Design — Volume II

Posted by · 10:42 am · October 16th, 2009

Diane Kruger in Inglourious BasterdsSince I last analyzed the costume design category in July, a number of the contenders are still waiting to be seen, though several have opened and we’ve seen glimpses from others. While the number of movers and shakers hasn’t been enormous, there has still been enough movement – and more insight gained – to warrant another look.

One thing I do not think has changed since the summer is the category’s most likely nominee.  While I’m doubtful that she will win, I’m quite confident that Janet Patterson will earn her third nomination for Jane Campion’s “Bright Star.” While the film did not catch fire to quite the extent I was expecting, I’m nevertheless confident the threads will remain in this branch’s mind until the end of the year.

In July, I was torn about whether Colleen Atwood could emerge as a double nominee this year. But “Public Enemies,” despite featuring fine period work, seems to have become a distant memory. Even so, I’d be very surprised if she failed to get nominated for Rob Marshall’s “Nine.”

The great Sandy Powell, on the other hand, has had her three potential nominees reduced to one. With “The Tempest” and “Shutter Island” moved to 2010, it’s only “The Young Victoria” that is keeping her in the race. Powell is a giant in the field. But is the film at all memorable?

Another veteran I still expect to find in the race is Jenny Beavan for “Sherlock Holmes.” Once a regular, Beavan has been out of the running since 2001’s “Gosford Park.” I still think that, if this film is a success (something I am admittedly not sold on), Beavan will find herself going to the Kodak once more.

Rising from the summer is Anna B. Sheppard.  Twice nominated for Oscar-winning World War II movies (“Schindler’s List” and “The Pianist”), she’s looking good for Quentin Tarantino’s “Inglourious Basterds.” The film did much better than I was expecting, and a lot of range was shown in her work.

Carey Mulligan in An EducationFading from the summer somewhat is Consolata Boyle, seeking her second nomination for Stephen Frears’s “Chéri.” Despite being largely forgettable, the threads were exactly the sort this category rewards – and this branch also tends to remember films elsewhere forgotten.  So I think Boyle still has a shot.

“An Education,” on the other hand, seems certain to show up in many categories come the end of the year. But Odile Dicks-Mireaux’s work strikes me as a tad too subtle for what this category usually rewards.

I have also been skeptical of “Amelia” all year and the lack of buzz continues to make me suspect there’s not a lot to this film. That said, if I’m wrong, Kasia Walicka-Maimone will likely be able to compete.  Meanwhile, what we have seen of “Avatar” makes me highly doubtful of Mayes C. Rubeo’s chances.

So what films have joined this race that I failed to mention in Jyuly? I’d primarily look to three.

Firstly, the success of Tom Ford’s “A Single Man” has somewhat surprised me. It seems as though Colin Firth is an extremely likely candidate for Best Actor, and Ford’s eye for the visual cannot be denied. While the 1960s is a tad modern by the standards of this category’s usual nominees, Arianne Phillips previously found herself nominated for a similar period (“Walk the Line”), so I think she’s firmly in the running.

Secondly, “Creation” finally found itself a distributor, putting Louise Sterjnsward’s threads in play. I must admit I have no faith in this film (no pun intended), but the period is exactly the sort that finds a home here. She could be a contender.

(from left) Christopher Plummer and Helen Mirren in The Last StationLastly, and more likely, we have Monika Jacobs for “The Last Station.” I’m still not sure what to make of this film, but Helen Mirren and Christopher Plummer seem like potential candidates for nominations. If they were to score, I strongly suspect glimpses to the crafts categories would follow, with this being the most likely.

Fewer and fewer films remain unseen as we make our second trip through the categories. Next week, we take a second look at Best Visual Effects again.

What are your thoughts on the costume design category?  Let us know in the comments section below!




→ 11 Comments Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Filed in: Tech Support

11 responses so far

  • 1 10-16-2009 at 11:02 am

    Loyal said...

    Casey Storm for Where The Wild Things Are?

  • 2 10-16-2009 at 12:59 pm

    red_wine said...

    Basterds
    Nine
    Bright Star
    An Education(The Queen was nominated and the film will be a major player so…)
    The Young Victoria(this category is just not complete without some period porn)

    Sherlock Homes, A Single Man, Creation strike me as extremely unlikely.

  • 3 10-16-2009 at 12:59 pm

    Lance said...

    The costumes in “Cheri” were amazing – I don’t know if they were historically accurate (do the voters?) but they were colorful, helped create some beautiful visuals and really suited the characters.

  • 4 10-16-2009 at 1:26 pm

    AmericanRequiem said...

    Bright Star, Inglorious Basterds

    THE LOVELY BONES, The costumes look fangtastic and still no mention?

  • 5 10-16-2009 at 4:15 pm

    Kate said...

    I think that:
    An Education
    Nine
    The Young Victoria
    A Single Man
    Inglorious Basterds

    or
    Amelia
    The lovely Bones
    Bright Star

    :)

  • 6 10-16-2009 at 8:00 pm

    Erik said...

    What about a Single Man? Looks set for multiple nods and a great deal of attention for its central performance. Directed by a giant from the fashion industry making a thusfar very successful directorial debut. Bonus points for being a period drama. More bonus points for costume designer Ariane Philips being a previous nominee (for Walk the Line).

    Also: The film looks very, very pretty, judging by the trailer.

  • 7 10-16-2009 at 11:27 pm

    Glenn said...

    “Coco avant Chanel”?

  • 8 10-17-2009 at 12:10 am

    Guy Lodge said...

    Patterson’s going for her fourth nom actually (I assume you’re forgetting “Oscar and Lucinda”). She also has the unusual career stat of having done only six features (prior to “Bright Star”) and getting nominated for half of them.

    If the Academy judged this category on how effectively the costumes serve/define their characters rather than simply which ones are prettiest/most elaborate, “An Education” would be a shoo-in. It’s really smart work there.

  • 9 10-17-2009 at 8:40 pm

    John said...

    Watchmen was very showy. Star Trek took costumes we all know & laugh at and made them worthy of a big-budget Hollywood blockbuster. If Avatar is more CGI than practical, then either of these pictures could take the fantasy costume slot.

  • 10 11-07-2009 at 6:54 pm

    aspect ratio said...

    One glaring omission: Ann Roth for Julie & Julia.

    The film was a hit, Streep will be nominated (meaning the film will be seen, and pushed for by the studio). Sure, half the film is contemporary but that can possibly help too since Roth had to design for both period and contemporary.

    Plus, the GRAND CARDINAL RULE of Costume Design is to always, always bet on the films that feature a female lead or plenty of female characters, and preferably in a period setting.

    Not to say that it’s a sure bet, but it should at the very least be on everyone’s radar.

  • 11 11-20-2009 at 2:15 am

    david said...

    Oscar for Consolata Boyle in Cheri¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡

    A great film and not forgettable¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡