THE LISTS: In Contention’s top 20 horror films of all time

Posted by · 1:11 pm · October 28th, 2008

228 Days LaterYes, how trite.  Another list of the “best” horror films of all time.  But this really is the most subjective of genres, is it not?  What is scary to us all has slipped out of the realm of the universal and become much more of a personal thing.

Certain films are inarguable, as our list certainly reflects here and there.  But across the landscape of horror filmmaking, you find perhaps the broadest range of creativity in the medium.  So it goes without saying that a list such as this ought to be varied.

Unlike the other lists we’ve featured here at In Contention, our rundown of the 20 best horror films of all time did not spring from the mind of this writer or that, but is instead representative of the collective.  We’ve polled each of our six contributors to ascertain their high marks in the genre and, through a complicated process of tabulation that involved thorough computation, lots of late nights and perhaps an abacus as well, the list was whittled down to the 20 films you see here.

There are mainstays aplenty, but we think you’ll be surprised by a few of the entries.  Each of us hold very different opinions, as should be expected when you get a southerner L.A. transplant, an Arkansas law professor, two Toronto natives 20 years apart in age, a north easterner who recently made the trek out west and a humble Brit.

We hope you enjoy the list.

Klaus Kinski in Nosferatu, the Vampyre20. “Nosferatu, the Vampyre” (Werner Herzog, 1979)
F.W. Murnau’s “Nosferatu, a Symphony of Horror” (also making our list) plays like a silent dream, moving slowly, with purpose. It is a film of images, its director firmly aware that film is a visual medium. Only Werner Herzog could have the courage to remake that classic, and in doing so, both pay homage to Murnau’s achievement and in many ways move past it.  Whereas Max Schreck seemed a disease come to life, Klaus Kinski is a human turned plague, his voice adding another realm and a new weapon in his arsenal of evil.  (J.F.)

Dana Wynter and Kevin McCarthy in Invasion of the Body Snatchers19. “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” (Don Siegel, 1956)
They mirror humans in every regard except that they are devoid of emotion…and they kill and dispose of their human counterparts.  A simple enough concept, but when Don Siegel’s “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” (adapted from the novel by Jack Finney) landed in 1956, some critics argued that the film was a reaction to the rise of McCarthyism in America.  Haunting enough, the film’s climax is perhaps its most chilling: Dr. Miles Bennell (Kevin McCarthy) runs crazily through oncoming traffic screaming of aliens and then turns to the camera and decries “They’re already here!  You’re next.” (B.R.)

The Fly18. “The Fly” (David Cronenberg, 1986)
The themes in David Cronenberg’s remake of “The Fly” are so universal: lost dreams, talent gone awry, doomed love, collegial rivalry and the inevitability of death (and coming to grips with that). And then there is that little aside about mutating into a six-foot insect. But that rather unique trait aside, what actually makes this film so terrifying, in my opinion, is watching Jeff Goldblum slowly descend into his horrific state — a descent so gradual, with each moment unfolding in a tragic, unparalleled fashion. It’s terrifying in a way that could only come from Cronenberg. (G.K.)

28 Days Later17. “28 Days Later” (Danny Boyle, 2003)
I made the mistake of waltzing into a theater alone in 2003 to see Danny Boyle’s “28 Days Later.”  It was broad daylight outside, a wonderful afternoon for a matinee.  But my peripheral vision was haunted with the tricks of my subconscious as I strolled back to the car.  If anyone was walking at a brisk pace, I thought for sure they were a rage-inflicted “zombie” from Boyle’s sublime film.  Beyond simply adding the heightened terror of zombies-that-run, Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland turned the genre on its ear by injecting a certain dose of realism and something approaching polemic. (K.T.)

Samantha Eggar in The Brood16. “The Brood” (David Cronenberg, 1979)
“The Brood” is arguably body-horror master David Cronenberg’s most personal film, as he unleashes his anguish and anger over his divorce onto the screen in ways few films can capture.  From the disturbing and deliciously absurd revelation at the film’s end, to the film’s biggest scare, which takes place in a brightly lit, perfectly still children’s classroom, the film uses the cliché of “creepy children” to startling effect.  But make no mistake, this is Cronenberg’s show, and for my money, one of the very finest films the genre has to offer. (B.K.)

Laurence Olivier in Marathon Man15. “Marathon Man” (John Schlesinger, 1976)
“Is it safe?” I never thought much of Laurence Olivier as an actor until I saw “Marathon Man,” and he has walked the landscape of my nightmares ever since. Is the film a horror movie? Horror movies are supposed to scare us right?  “Marathon Man” terrified me in my youth, impacted the manner in which I think of dentists to this day.  And Szell, a Nazi, surviving on the gold he extracted from the teeth of Jews and the diamonds he traded for life – it’s the worst of all monsters, no? Watch the scene where he walks through the diamond market and is recognized by a terror-struck Jewess…that is true horror. (J.F.)

Blue Velvet14. “Blue Velvet” (David Lynch, 1986)
Whether this is a bona fide entry in the horror genre or not is open to question, but there’s no denying David Lynch’s unhinged vision of suburbia through the looking glass is among the most frightening films ever made. Beginning as campy noir-toned mystery when a clean-cut teen discovers a severed ear in a field, “Blue Velvet” spirals into a full-blown study of human evil as the subsequent investigation leads to Dennis Hopper’s Frank Booth, a psychopathic sadist who tortures, rapes, kills, lobotomizes — and whatever else he needs to do to rank as the most perverted of great screen villains. (G.L.)

Harvey Stephens in The Omen13. “The Omen” (Richard Donner, 1976)
“Damien, it’s all for you!” Who would have thought that one of the screenwriters of “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory” could deliver such a tight and terrifying tale of the birth and childhood of The Antichrist? I guess in a way, it does make perverse sense somehow. With a fantastic Gregory Peck in the lead, and possibly Richard Donner’s most sure-handed directing, “The Omen” is about as good as they come. The climactic scene in the church between father and Antichrist is near biblical in its execution. (Think Abraham and Hell.)  The script, meanwhile, is chock-full of spine-tingling scares, all of which were neutered in 2006’s dreadful remake. (B.K.)

The Last Wave12. “The Last Wave” (Peter Weir, 1977)
Peter Weir’s most underrated film and, together with “Picnic at Hanging Rock,” his finest. A slow-burning mood piece steeped in Australian folklore, it follows Richard Chamberlain’s liberal lawyer as he takes on a pro bono case defending a group of Aborigine murder suspects, and promptly begins experiencing apocalyptic premonitions. On paper, there’s no reason why the film should amount to more than faintly patronizing mumbo-jumbo, but Weir expertly accumulates fear in layers rather than in jolts, aided by disturbing imagery of uncanny natural forces — as in the opening scene, where hail falls relentlessly from a cloudless sky. (G.L.)

The Innocents11. “The Innocents” (John Clayton, 1961)
The most precisely and elegantly tuned of all ghost stories, Jack Clayton’s unshakeable adaptation of Henry James’s “The Turn of the Screw” suffused the Victorian formality of the source with wildly Freudian sexual tension, courtesy of co-scripter Truman Capote. Following Deborah Kerr’s nervy governess as she is (or isn’t) haunted by apparitions in a vast countryside mansion, the film spawned innumerable imitators, most successfully “The Others” in 2001.  But none could match the taut control Clayton exerts over the material, or the dreamy tonal depths of Freddie Francis’s lush black-and-white cinematography. (G.L.)

Repulsion10. “Repulsion” (Roman Polanski, 1965)
I first saw Roman Polanski’s icy, unrivaled psychological thriller when I was 11.  I suffered nightmares of rabbits, razor blades and hands protruding from walls for days afterward. Some would say I was too young, but I have exactly the same reaction to the film today. Creating claustrophobic terror from the most benign of premises — Catherine Deneuve’s lonely, sexually naïve young woman is left to her own devices for a weekend in her sister’s dreary London apartment — Polanski charts her mental breakdown through unnerving manipulation of space and some of the most ingenious sound design in all cinema. (G.L.)

Nosferatu, a Symphony of Horror9. “Nosferatu, a Symphony of Horror” (F. W. Murnau, 1922)
It took me a while to warm up to silent movies. After the initial exposure of Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton, I started digging into more of the classics. “Nosferatu” was a natural place for me to start given my love of Bram Stoker’s creation. But it was F.W. Murnau who really made this film a masterpiece. From lighting to performances to suspense to mere camera placement, I was glued to the screen throughout and immediately watched it again after finishing! Max Schreck is so good, so terrifying, I often feel Willem Dafoe’s take on the actor in “Shadow of the Vampire” must have been accurate. (G.K.)

Elsa Lanchester in Bride of Frankenstein8. “Bride of Frankenstein” (James Whale, 1935)
One of the few sequels that enjoys the designation of creatively surpassing the original, James Whale’s “Bride of Frankenstein” is one of the most expertly crafted films of the genre.  Expanding on ideas lifted from the work of Mary Shelley, Whale went back to work with Boris Karloff with an eye toward expanding our understanding of Frankenstein’s monster and his own tangible emotions and realities, however manifested.  But it was Elsa Lanchester who gave the film’s startling central portrayal, matching Karloff grunt-for-grunt and carving her own place alongside the classic movie monster pantheon. (K.T.)

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre7. “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” (Tobe Hooper, 1974)
Tobe Hooper’s “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” has never received its proper due. Cult followings just don’t cut it. There is something to be said for the horror that this brand of blasé violence can. I find myself one of the few fans of the film’s glossy remake three decades later, but what the original had going for it was a near docudrama approach to visually conveying the narrative, the sense that we were there, paralyzed to assist. To this day, the moment Leatherface steps out and clunks one of our heroes across the skull with a mallet and retreats with body in tow leaves a cold feeling in my stomach. (K.T.)

Anthony Hopkins in The Silence of the Lambs6. “The Silence of the Lambs” (Jonathan Demme, 1991)
In 1991, Jonathan Demme re-introduced moviegoers to Hannibal Lecter, perhaps the most cunning and psychotic screen villain of all time.  Anthony Hopkins, taking over a role played by Brian Cox in the first Lecter film “Manhunter,” exposed his most cerebral and frighteningly gifted talents in the lead role. His matching of wits with Clarice Starling, played by Jodie Foster, remains one of the finest duets ever conveyed on screen by two leading actors.  Although an early February release, the film captured five Academy Awards including wins in all five of the major categories – a feat matched only twice before and never since. (B.R.)

Mia Farrow in Rosemary\'s Baby5. “Rosemary’s Baby” (Roman Polanski, 1968)
What makes “Rosemary’s Baby” work so well as a horror film is that it’s content to not be “scary” for long stretches of time. Sure, there are odd neighbors and a puzzling death, but director Roman Polanski is wise enough to take his time with the horror. When it finally comes, its pitch perfect. Mia Farrow gives one of her best performances here, especially in the final sequence. The amount of emotion she conveys in what could have been, if handled poorly, a campy and hysterical scene elevates “Rosemary’s Baby” to the classic status it so very much deserves. (B.K.)

Psycho4. “Psycho” (Alfred Hitchcock, 1960)
I first saw “Psycho” when I was 13, just discovering a passion for film. My parents would barely let me see many of the films I wanted to, but as they were huge Hitchcock fans, “Psycho” was allowed. The good thing is that I was completely in the dark about the film’s twists and turns, not to mention the ending, and thus could fully appreciate Hitchcock’s steady building of tension and the plot, its cleverness and the utter horror and madness of the film’s descent. To this day, I maintain that Anthony Perkins’s Norman Bates is the greatest movie villain ever captured. (G.K.)

Susan Backlinie in Jaws3. “Jaws” (Steven Spielberg, 1975)
It’s been 35 years since Steven Spielberg’s “Jaws” changed the course of movie history.  A masterpiece of directing, editing, scoring, and acting, lean writing, and superb sound, the film remains a knockout, at its core, the primal terror of what lurks beneath the ocean’s surface.  From an eerie opening scene to a tragic fountain of blood, to poor Quint’s final moments, the film holds you in a tight grip throughout.  With elements of Moby Dick merged with those great Universal monster movies, and three very different men on a quest, all for different reasons, “Jaws” is one of the most terrifying rides in movie history. (J.F.)

Jack Nicholson in The Shining2. “The Shining” (Stanley Kubrick, 1980)
Made in 1980, “The Shining” is a classic of the horror genre.  Directed by Stanley Kubrick from a novel by Stephen King, the film chronicles the arrival of Jack Torrance (Jack Nicholson) and his family to the Overlook Hotel where he has accepted a job as the winter caretaker.  As expected, the family becomes isolated as a result of a winter storm.  Failing to make progress on his novel, Torrence eventually goes mad with cabin fever (and perhaps something more).  Nicholson is petrifying in the lead role, and that “Here’s Johnny!” sequence remains one of the most iconic moments in cinematic history. (B.R.)

The Exorcist1. “The Exorcist” (William Friedkin, 1973)
The moment is still pretty clear in my memory. A 30-minute climactic sequence, a little girl spewing pea soup and spouting expletives with an inhuman cadence, the stark lighting that seized the heart and arrested the attention of a young boy scared shitless. Even in the later, inevitable post-adolescent days of anti-spirituality, William Friedkin’s “The Exorcist” had my number. The film isn’t just the greatest horror film ever made, but one of the most successfully manipulative pieces of cinema ever designed. Linda Blair’s portrayal of a young girl taken by a demonic force received an invaluable assist from Mercedes McCambridge, but the real tension of the narrative can be felt in Ellen Burstyn’s horrified observation. In some cases, the cliché is simply the truth. (K.T.)

Just missed the list: “Alien,” “Dawn of the Dead” (1978), “Deliver Us from Evil,” “Frankenstein,” “Freaks,” “Jacob’s Ladder,” “The Mummy” (1932), “Peeping Tom,” “The Phantom of the Opera” (1925), “Signs,” “The Vanishing” (1988), “Wolf Creek”

Have your say.  What is the greatest horror film of all time?  Or give us your list!

→ 60 Comments Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Filed in: Featured · The Lists

60 responses so far

  • 1 10-28-2008 at 1:30 pm

    Diego said...

    Excelent Top 20!

    Rottentomatoes list is laughable! King Kong rank first! jajaja.

    Best Motion Picture 2008:
    Revolutionary Road
    The curious case of Benjamin Button

  • 2 10-28-2008 at 1:32 pm

    Kristopher Tapley said...

    Sooo….why the random listing of the best pictures of 2008?

  • 3 10-28-2008 at 1:35 pm

    Chad said...

    Alien (1979)
    The Blair Witch Project (1999)
    Le Boucher (1970)
    Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1992)
    Les Diaboliques (1955)
    Don’t Look Now (1973)
    The Exorcist (1973)
    Eyes Without a Face (1960)
    The Haunting (1963)
    Images (1972)
    Jaws (1975)
    Psycho (1960)
    Rosemary’s Baby (1968)
    Seconds (1966)
    The Shining (1980)
    The Vanishing (1988)

  • 4 10-28-2008 at 1:55 pm

    Patrick said...

    No list of scariest films is complete without “Carnival of Souls.”

    That demonic face!

  • 5 10-28-2008 at 1:58 pm

    Patrick said...

    I would also include “Dressed to Kill.”

  • 6 10-28-2008 at 2:01 pm

    Andrew L. said...

    I think The Silence of the Lambs has degraded over the years; I just saw it again recently, and the more I revisit it, the more I feel either Thelma or Louise should have gotten the statuette that year.

    Anthony Hopkins’ performance still holds up, but he was placed in the wrong category.

  • 7 10-28-2008 at 2:03 pm

    nick said...

    Alien should be on the list.

    Open Water is a movie that actually scared me.

  • 8 10-28-2008 at 2:13 pm

    Kristopher Tapley said...

    I agree on all counts, Andrew.

  • 9 10-28-2008 at 2:49 pm

    R.J. said...

    I think Carrie (1976) definitely deserves a spot on this list as well as The Others (2001) and Halloween (1978). I pretty much agree with the films that did make the list though, and I’m already planning on checking out those that I am unfamiliar with.

  • 10 10-28-2008 at 2:58 pm

    Bryan said...

    Inland Empire. The sound design, god, the sound design.

  • 11 10-28-2008 at 3:00 pm

    David said...

    The list is great, except for missing the following 3 somehere in the middle of the list;

    CARRIE – featuring the milestone frightening performance from Piper Laurie

    DONT LOOK NOW – totally unnerving and unsettling for days after viewing – horror of the psychological kind.

    THE OTHER (not the OTHERS) – with a couple of onscreen twists that actually caused spine tingling jolts to the body. With Uta Hagen and the creepiest pair of twins every filmed.

  • 12 10-28-2008 at 3:02 pm

    Ross Miller said...

    Although I am saddened to see one of the most overrated films, and probably THE most overrated horrors of all time, The Exorcist at number 1 I can look past and forgive that because the highly overrated The Wicker Man (original) and Halloween (original) are not on the list.

    Please, don’t hate me, horror fanatics.

  • 13 10-28-2008 at 3:19 pm

    Ross Miller said...


    oh god yes, Inland Empire. I mean, like Blue Velvet, technically not a horror but it freaked me out in more than a few occasions. Oh man that scene where Laura Dern is half running up the driveway with the biggest, forced smile on her face…urgh….for some reson that forced smile thing scares the hell out of me when used in that way. Just terrifying. Man I LOVE that movie.

  • 14 10-28-2008 at 3:21 pm

    Speaking English said...

    Why oh why is “Hour of the Wolf” so undervalued? Ingmar Bergman crafted a horror film for the ages, an immensely unsettling and terrifying vision of psychological decay in isolation, with some of the most stunning B&W cinematography ever put to film.

    More people need to see this film! Go out and get it now! Halloween’s around the corner.

  • 15 10-28-2008 at 3:33 pm

    Sound Designer Dan said...

    Even though it’s too new to put on the list, the last 10 minutes of “[REC]” are so terrifying I actually broke the arm of the chair I was sitting in. Unfortunately, its remake “Quarantine” couldn’t even replicate a tenth of that terror.

  • 16 10-28-2008 at 3:34 pm

    Rolando said...

    You know, I would have placed Alien instead of Blue Velvet (a great film but not entirely horror for me) But your list is quite accurate.

    I must aknowleage to you that not a single dumb teen slash horror mediocre films were included.

    Of course there are some great horror films that a bonus list could have:
    The Others
    Les Diaboliques

    Mel Gibson’s The Passion of Christ and Man without face (JUST KIDDING!!!!)

    Great job! Thanks for making remember those chills!

  • 17 10-28-2008 at 3:35 pm

    The InSneider said...

    Who the hell would list Wolf Creek as an honorable mention? That movie was trash. Nice call on Open Water though, Nick. That movie was terrifying. And I understand leaving off Child’s Play and Candyman but Halloween and Alien should be on. Nice old school list though.

  • 18 10-28-2008 at 4:26 pm

    Joshua said...

    I would add Halloween and Night of The Living Dead to that great list. The Exorcist will always make my number one on these lists. I don’t see anything surpassing that.

  • 19 10-28-2008 at 4:26 pm

    Guy Lodge said...

    “Who the hell would list Wolf Creek as an honorable mention?”

    I don’t know who else did, InSneider, but it was on my list. Hardly the cleverest or most stylish horror film, but it scared the living shit out of me. Sometimes the visceral reaction is the one that counts.

    Plus, my list had nothing from the last 20 years on it (I so agree with Kris and Andrew on “Lambs”), so I felt like adding something a bit newer for variety. It was between that and “Ginger Snaps.”

    Oddly, the only reason I didn’t put “Don’t Look Now” on my list because I assumed it would get enough attention elsewhere. That’s the fun of these things.

  • 20 10-28-2008 at 5:26 pm

    McGuff said...

    I confess to not really watching horror films — just a genre that never really rubs me the right way.

    However, I wonder what it means that basically every movie mentioned in this thread, save 28 Days Later and Signs, is more than 15 years old.

    For those who follow the genre closer: if this a dying brand that’s becoming lowest common denominator?

  • 21 10-28-2008 at 5:49 pm

    Guy Lodge said...

    I’m not a complete aficionado of the genre, but I wouldn’t necessarily say it’s a dying brand — there always has been drek around.

    I think it’s because horror, more than most genres, really hangs on personal experience — I know a lot of the films on my list were ones I saw when I was younger and more impressionable.

  • 22 10-28-2008 at 5:54 pm

    Patrick said...

    “Ils,” or as it is titled domestically, “Them,” had me hooked immediately. Nasty little gem. And the Hollywood version with Liv Tyler sucked.

  • 23 10-28-2008 at 6:13 pm

    R.J. said...

    Inland Empire scared the crap out of me and Candyman is a film that I haven’t been able to watch since the first time I saw it as a kid…I don’t know what it is but that movie really gets to me!

  • 24 10-28-2008 at 6:27 pm

    Joel said...

    Child’s Play
    The Descent
    Quarantine (yes, I liked it…)

  • 25 10-28-2008 at 7:35 pm

    Daniel said...

    Pretty typical list… I would’ve killed to have seen Fulci’s City of the Living Dead on here.. hell.. even Suspiria would do >_<

    My top 5

    1. City of the Living Dead
    2. Halloween (Carpenter)
    3. [REC]
    4. Zodiac (I personally consider it a horror)
    5. Candyman

  • 26 10-28-2008 at 7:41 pm

    Daniel said...

    Awe man… why no love for The Thing? That definitely deserves at least an honorable mention.

  • 27 10-28-2008 at 7:49 pm

    Seany P said...

    I like that Signs is on honorable mention. People will refuse to admit it but it did have me scared in the theater. I have to say though of M Night’s films the scariest and best is The Sixth Sense.

  • 28 10-28-2008 at 8:14 pm

    Andrew L. said...

    What about “It”? (in terms of “I saw it when I was a kid…”)
    Not exactly the scariest of movies now, but it’s probably a key progenerate of coulrophobia–fear of clowns.

    I think stupid movies like “Saw (1… through 37)” and “The Hills Have Eyes” contribute to the dying horror genre. Suspense and fear have degenerated into “[XYZ] jumps out of the dark after a brief moment of silence” and redudant gore.

  • 29 10-28-2008 at 8:19 pm

    Adam Smith said...

    Joel, thanks for mentioning The Descent–for my money, the scariest film of the past decade, easily. Every time I watch it, I still get as deeply disturbed as my first time seeing it. And I also agree with Nick–Open Water is a film that creates atmosphere so wonderfully, and it’s an atmosphere of complete and utter dread at every turn. The nighttime storm sequence is absolutely terrifying, and I would argue the ending is one of the most chilling moments ever put to celluloid.

    As for Wolf Creek as an honorable mention, I’ve got to protest. For me, Wolf Creek was a film that very much fell in that same vein as the Saw and Hostel films. Given, Wolf Creek is not torture porn in the same way those two franchises are, but this idea of complete and utter hopelessness, where the feeling is one of “OK, how are we gonna kill THIS person off?”, as opposed to any actual suspense or hope for survival. Absolutely turned me off.

  • 30 10-28-2008 at 8:46 pm

    Joel said...

    Adam, Descent was TERRIFYING.

    Anyway, I am an ardent supporter of the “Saw” trilogy, so no. 3 would be an honorable mention.

  • 31 10-28-2008 at 8:59 pm

    Sean Knight said...

    the absence of Alien from your top 20 is questionable indeed. probably in my top five. to each their own though

  • 32 10-28-2008 at 10:11 pm

    Brad said...

    I would definitely throw Session 9 in my top 20.

  • 33 10-29-2008 at 2:42 am

    The InSneider said...

    Session 9 is great. And Guy, horror is a pretty personal thing so to each his own but it still doesn’t really change the fact that Wolf Creek was utter bullshit. If anyone on here is into creepy Asian movies, rent Cure.

  • 34 10-29-2008 at 4:12 am

    AdamL said...

    Loose interpretation of horror I think. I would argue Silence of the Lambs, Rosemary’s Baby, Blue Velvet, Jaws, Reupulsion and (most laughably) Marathon Man are not horror films. If some of these are horror films then just about any thriller would qualify.

    [Rec] is probably the best true horror I’ve ever seen. I was actually laughing at myself over how scared I was at times.

    The Exorcist is a pretty decent choice for number 1, although it was spoiled somewhat for me by the fact that I saw it for the first time when it was rereleased in the UK in about 2000 and 90% of the people in the cinema were laughing hysterically throughout.

  • 35 10-29-2008 at 5:39 am

    David said...

    I think Audition and Oldboy are both terrifying to watch.

  • 36 10-29-2008 at 5:44 am

    Joel said...

    I agree with AdamL on those movies listed. Except for “Silence of the Lambs.” That freaked me out.

    And let me clear this up: I liked “Quarantine” because I haven’t seen “[REC].” It still scared the hell outta me, but maybe it won’t be as successful once I see (read: find) the original.

  • 37 10-29-2008 at 9:24 am

    R.J. said...

    I tried so hard to like Suspiria but, in all honesty, it did nothing for me in the terms of scares. I thought it looked beautiful, but it just wasn’t all it was cracked up to be, that movie pretty much turned me off of Argento’s films, though I am interested to see his new film. The Descent was also a huge disappointment for me, maybe I need to watch it again?

  • 38 10-29-2008 at 11:21 am

    Kokushi said...

    Halloween (78) deserve to be on that list, Rosemary’s Baby was great but it wasnt scary and Blue Velvet was awesome but it was more shocking that scary.

  • 39 10-29-2008 at 11:59 am

    Kristopher Tapley said...

    I despise “Suspiria.” Not scary, not visually interesting, just a terrible piece of “cinema” that enjoys a fortunate cult fanbase.

    I liked “The Descent” quite a bit, but for God’s sake, stay away from the director’s follow-up — the worst film of the year.

  • 40 10-29-2008 at 10:52 pm

    Glenn said...

    Adam, I’d agree with you on “Wolf Creek” until I remember that only two people actually die in that movie (three actually, but the man who is shot on the roadside is in the movie for about a minute) and then I remember all that screaming and the helplessness I gotta acknowledge that for a film with only three potential victims I was incredibly frightened for a large majority of the running time.

    I’m a bit sad that nobody even in comments has mentioned “The Blair Witch Project”. I know it’s still popular to mock it, but I still think it’s the scariest movie I’ve ever seen. It felt so incredibly real (and yet, unlike some other idiots, I actually know it’s a movie and can discern that the whole thing is a manipulation – duh) and those night sequences were all terrifying. The final moment in the house are just… paralyising is the best word for it. JOSH! JOSH! aaagh.

    I do have to call out the mention of “Rosemary’s Baby” for this quote – “Mia Farrow gives one of her best performances here”. I coulda sworn people consider this her best performance period. Right?

    And I’m a very big fan of “The Texas Chain Saw Massacre”. Utter desperate helplessness and the sound of a chainsaw is bound to get me shaking. Something about being murdered by a freakin’ chainsaw feels so much worse than whatever the latest slasher flick can utilise. I also like the remake though. It’s glossier, true, but with that gloss comes another angle altogether to the story. And all that screaming… my god, THE SCREAMING! Something about the sound of screaming (and I mean true screaming, not the sort of screaming someone like… oh, I dunno, Brittany Snow in “Prom Night”) is just so unsettling, don’t you think?

    Last thing: Scariest individual scene: The opening scene of “Scream”. Drew Barrymore deserved an Oscar nomination for that. Truly shocking stuff.

  • 41 10-29-2008 at 10:54 pm

    Glenn said...

    Wow. sorry. that was too long. I apologise.

  • 42 10-30-2008 at 12:44 am

    Ross Miller said...

    I LOVED The Descent, my favourite horror film after The Shining and Psycho. Scared the hell out of the first time and it still does to this day. And I agree largely with you on Doomsday, Kris. Didn’t think it was worst of the year material or anything but certainly not good. (And did you lie his first flick, Dog Soldiers? For what I perceive to be no good reason that was well received in places. Hopefully Marshall can bring another Descent next time around).

  • 43 11-01-2008 at 7:18 am

    cos said...

    you have missed sixth sense, best horror movie of the 90’s.from 00’s: the others, the orphanage, the devil’s backbone.

  • 44 11-02-2008 at 2:14 am

    Eunice said...

    Hey, I have an idea for a List! (that is, if you’ve never done it before. i’m new to the site, so apologies if it’s been done.) What about ’20 Hollywood movies that should not be remade–ever’?. Or maybe a List of Hollywood movies that you want to see remade, and with whom.

  • 45 11-02-2008 at 4:20 am

    Guy Lodge said...

    I like the second idea in particular, Eunice — we’ll bear it in mind!

  • 46 11-03-2008 at 4:33 am

    Eunice said...

    Thanks, Guy. I’m really excited to see that list in the future.

    I was so excited about the idea that I forgot to comment about the actual list. I saw ‘The Exorcist’ in 4th grade with my entire batch, and aside from the fact that I had quite a few nightmares after watching the movie, I also couldn’t forget the guy sitting next to me who was basically cowering in front of the screen. So it’s a perfect choice for the number 1 spot.

    Oh, and ‘The Exorcism of Emily Rose’ should be on the list. That’s one decent horror film. And it’s also something I’ve only watched once, and will never watch again, even for cheap thrill of being scared. The trial which was supposed to have framed the movie was a little boring, but had it not been there, it would have just been another ‘Exorcist’. ‘Emily Rose’ had me sleeping next to my mom for two weeks, all the while waking up at 3 a.m., which, if you haven’t seen the movie, is supposed to freak you out.

  • 47 2-18-2009 at 8:21 pm

    saj said...

    I agree with what Eunice said. Exorcism of Emily Rose is a good movie. It is not an out on out horror movie, but yes it has a couple of scenes which can scare the hell out of the viewer. I wonder how Shutter has not been mentioned by anybody so far. Its one of the best horror movie I have ever watched. Right from the beginning of the movie until the end, you will glued to your seats.
    Happy Watching

  • 48 3-10-2009 at 8:35 am

    Alex said...

    I’d offer the East Asian sub-genre of horror as worth at least a mention on this board. For all the talk of contemporary horror being misrepresented on this list, the recent works of Japanese and Korean film-makers have proven rich sources for truly terifying cinema. While revisiting the themes made subject by such films as The Shining, Poltergiest and The Exorcist – that of perverted innocence; fear of the otherwise banal; and the uncontrollable wrath of ‘imagined’ evil – we have been witness to unique and fresh methods of conveying suspense and terror in the filmic form.

  • 49 7-27-2009 at 12:46 pm

    Alex said...

    I think the grudge should get a mention (japanese not american) because I found it scary